Welcome!

By registering with us, you'll be able to discuss, share and private message with other members of our community.

Sign Up Now!

Best overseas leagues for Aussies?

Decentric

Fan Favourite
Joined
Oct 17, 2024
Replies
1,128
I'm starting this thread, because of the way that the holistic national coaching system in Australia has pursued a specific pathway.

The English speaking leagues many of our players go to, don't have a national system like Australia does, which is based on Netherlands, Germany, France and Spain.

England is renowned for having a poor national coaching system - according to senior coaches from France, Germany, Italy, Netherlands and Germany - but have a very rich EPL. Many coaches from these countries have moved to England chasing the big money in the EPL and the Championship - richer than all leagues except the Big Five in UEFA.

The players that I see who play in Scotland and England, appear to make marginal progress after leaving Australia when they play for the Socceroos - if they are selected. When one looks at the football performance criteria I've listed below, most improve football conditioning, and probably 1v1 defensive skills. But in other ways they stagnate - which is cause for concern.

Of course if our players play in any of the Big Five leagues in UEFA, they will have had to improve since leaving Aus. It may be a bridge too far for many Aus players - even for countries where football is the main sport.

According to Quickflick, formerly of IS/442, who lives in France, the French clubs don't tend to recruit many players who aren't French speakers. So French Div 2 may not be a realistic option for Aus players? Aime Jacquet, former French Tech Dir, and World Cup wining coach, thought the AL in 2007 was similar quality to French Div 2.

According to Benjamin, formerly of 442/IS, a player agent and scout, told me Spanish Div 2 often don't pay players!

If Aussies go to Netherlands or Belgium, they are coached in a very similar way to Aussies. This was 16 - 12 years ago, but Dutch coaches Berger, Baan, Derkson, Schans, all who've coached in Aus in different roles, claimed the AL was probably similar standard to upper Div 2 in Netherlands and the lower echelons of Eredivisie. Also, Belgium probably fits this category.

When I used to watch the Championship a lot when I had TV access, in the era Jedi played, most teams played nothing like Dutch, Belgian, French or Spanish teams. Ditto English League One. I've been told the Championship has changed, because Continental coaches have been drawn by the money to coach in this league - the 6th richest in the world.

When I watched League One it was tactically naive. Ditto the Scottish League.

If I list:
First touch
Striking the ball
Handling speed
1v1 attacking skills
1v1 defensive skills
Running with the ball
Game sense
Football conditioning;

destinations like Scotland, and England, further north than Belgium and Netherlands in Europe, one doesn't tend to see much improvement since leaving the AL in many players.


They seem to improve in football conditioning and 1v1 defensive skills from playing in England and Scotland, unless playing for Glasgow Rangers or Celtic, and of course the EPL ( very few Aussie players being good enough).

Yet if one looks recently at Bos and O'Neill in Belgium, they've improved in a greater range of football performance criteria listed above. Haven't seen Ballard since moving to the Dutch league.

Baccus and Miller have improved in wider areas than most other Scottish based Aussies. ATM Stam may be improving his goal scoring too? Yengi has improved in a wider range of areas as well, but still needs to improve his first touch and shielding.

However, Rowles, Atkinson ( went backwards), Devlin, Strain, Yazbek, haven't improved in a diverse range of skills listed. Haven't seen Niuew or Nisbet since leaving Aus.

Looking the the English system they have 4 pro leagues.

Looking at Netherlands they have 2 pro leagues, Eredivisie and Eerste. The Eredivisies' top teams tend to be as good as the better teams in the Big Five. They have mid-ranked teams who never get relegated. According to the Dutch coaches in Aus the bottom teams in the Eredivisie are much lower in calibre, similar to A L teams. I'd assume this scenario replicates in Belgium - and - in Portugal and Switzerland.

Given the tactical side of Belgium and Netherlands, is the same to the Aus NC, no matter which pro league they are playing in these countries, it is going to be better than England's Lower Leagues and Scotland.

Switzerland is very well-organised - nothing like th e organisational shambles of CCM is in Aus, when viewing a doco about it!

Would it be better for Aus players to be playing in the likes of:

Netherlands, Belgium, Portugal, Switzerland Div 2 - hoping to move up to Div 1?

The likes of football promotion to the top leagues in these countries are high quality, technically and tactically, particularly the big clubs in these leagues who play a lot of intra-continental football? Sporting, Benfica, Porto, Ajax, PSV, Feyenoorde, Young Boys, Grasshoppers, FC Zurich, Anderlecht are competitive in Champ League and Europa League.

Throw in Greece too. They have 4 big clubs. Not sure what Greek Div 2 is like?

Aussies have done well in Croatia - in terms of improving.

J League 1 and 2. We've seen the massive improvement in the national Japanese team. They must be pushing for a world powerhouse rep.

How good is the new Saudi league with all the money thrown at it?

If players aren't good enough to be recruited to the Big Five leagues 1 and 2, for whatever reasons, maybe there could be better options than English lower leagues, Scotland and far northern Europe?

The current AL must be like bad versions of the Belgian and Dutch top leagues, but Aus teams are trying to play the same way as them.
 
The original holy trinity. Belgium, Holland, Bundesliga 2.
Swiss Danish and championship aren't bad either


Only worry about the championship these days is it's a much bigger adjustment to go from 26 to 46 games a year
 
Swiss Danish and championship aren't bad either


Only worry about the championship these days is it's a much bigger adjustment to go from 26 to 46 games a year
EFL is good for the safety net of more matches available. That didn't help Souttar last season though.

It's such a gruelling campaign.
 
EFL is good for the safety net of more matches available. That didn't help Souttar last season though.

It's such a gruelling campaign.
Yeah if you are a rotation player championship is great, but if you are a standout I start to worry about burnout
 
I note that you wrote that the French don't tend to hire non-French speakers (except Ligue 1). However, when international players that hail from countries where English is not the native tongue, many have an excellent grasp of English. This is one area that Australian sports people need to improve on.

And I agree that Australian players ought to avoid Scotland unless they know they are not going to improve much more.
 
I note that you wrote that the French don't tend to hire non-French speakers (except Ligue 1). However, when international players that hail from countries where English is not the native tongue, many have an excellent grasp of English. This is one area that Australian sports people need to improve on.

And I agree that Australian players ought to avoid Scotland unless they know they are not going to improve much more.
I'm no expert on the French football recruitment, other than knowing a bit about the training ground practices.

In terms of who the French clubs chase from other countries, I've listened to Quickflick. When Robbie Slater played at Lens in France he said the club president spoke fluent English, but after meeting him the first time, he never spoke English to him again.

We have a scenario in Aus where we follow the football curricula of non- English speaking countries, whilst most of our players play in the English speaking British leagues - where in the past there has been little Continental influence until recent times, particularly in the EPL.

It may surprise some, but the English Football Association has marvelled at Australia producing competent national teams that punch well above their weight, given the individual quality of Aus players at club level. The team unit has been more successful. In England the FA rationalises they have achieved the opposite. The English national teams haven't achieved what they should, given the calibre of the individuals playing for England.
 
Yeah if you are a rotation player championship is great, but if you are a standout I start to worry about burnout
Agreed. 24 teams is too many, imo. I'd like to see a new league with all the English clubs from Yorkshire and Lancashire north up to the border combine with the Scottish clubs to form new 18 club divisions and reduce England Championship, League One and Two divisions to 20 teams each. So you'd have, for example, Newcastle, Leeds, Celtic, Rangers, Sheffield United, Sheffield Wednesday. Burnley, Boro, Sunderland, Blackburn Rovers, Preston North-End, Hearts, Hibs, Aberdeen, Blackpool, Barnsley, Huddersfield, Hull as a possible 18. Still under the control of the SFA but perhaps renamed to British Premier League or Atlantic Super League etc. By my extremely rough calculations, I think there'd still be a slim majority of Scottish clubs throughout the divisions, which FIFA would probably insist on.
 
Smack bang in the middle of europe is the goldilocks zone of aussie footballing development. You can go either way to the left or right depending on your cultural upbringing which gives you a slight buff either way.
 

Attachments

  • aussiedevelopmentmap.png
    aussiedevelopmentmap.png
    645.4 KB · Views: 8
  • Haha
Reactions: LFC
I'm no expert on the French football recruitment, other than knowing a bit about the training ground practices.

In terms of who the French clubs chase from other countries, I've listened to Quickflick. When Robbie Slater played at Lens in France he said the club president spoke fluent English, but after meeting him the first time, he never spoke English to him again.

We have a scenario in Aus where we follow the football curricula of non- English speaking countries, whilst most of our players play in the English speaking British leagues - where in the past there has been little Continental influence until recent times, particularly in the EPL.

It may surprise some, but the English Football Association has marvelled at Australia producing competent national teams that punch well above their weight, given the individual quality of Aus players at club level. The team unit has been more successful. In England the FA rationalises they have achieved the opposite. The English national teams haven't achieved what they should, given the calibre of the individuals playing for England.
Have you made any assessment of MLS?
 
Have you made any assessment of MLS?
Interesting you say this, Dr Bellows?

I've known players head off to American unis/colleges on soccer scholarships. They really emphasise physical conditioning in terms of strength, with a high onus on weight training - like gridiron. US football methodology is considered backwards by Europeans and South Americans.

Yet I think the US does better in World Cups than one would expect. I don't have any definitive data on this though?

The fact the US and Mexico ( like Japan verging on being a world powerhouse) have closely fought matches in WCQs, is testament to something being right in the US development. They have 320 million population. This helps.

It is a good question as to how players develop in the MLS compared to far northern Europe, English Lower Leagues and Scotland? Like Australia in the past, the US was renowned as developing football athletes, as opposed to footballers with a high level of skill.

Welcome to the forum too! This is the third or fourth football forum we've participated on together!
 
Really think Switzerland is a great place... easy to get by with just English and has some bigger clubs to move to that can then propel you to a big 5 league. Lot of aussies have been successful there. Half the league qualifies for european competitions.
 
Have you made any assessment of MLS?
I was going to say, like for like pretty much, MLS 15 shop comp.
Suit our young fellas - yet I struggle why its hard for young players not having the gas in the tank to play for more games like in EU.
Your a Pro, young fit - doesn't take long getting up to pace, let alone one who really desires making it does alot of extra fitness and ball work in their own time.

D, there isn't many mericans doing it great in EU now, there was a few doing really well in the EPL a while back and right now just 2.
One in Forest as the 2nd GK and midfielder Adams at Bournemouth.
Pulisic ex Chelsea now in SerieA.
 
Really think Switzerland is a great place... easy to get by with just English and has some bigger clubs to move to that can then propel you to a big 5 league. Lot of aussies have been successful there.
They have.

Amazingly, when I was in Switzerland I read an article in a magazine how instrumental Roy Hodgson had been in their development system!

It was incredibly well organised. I can imagine everything in the Swiss football system being optimised and efficient. All the mistakes made in other countries in a range of sports, I can't imagine occurring in Switzerland.

There were good links between Swiss pro clubs and grass roots, re talent spotting.

One issue in Oz is a lot of the talent scouts write reports based on the English system. The English FA are in the words of a pro coach I know in England, 'Everything about football stops at the English Channel for the Football Association.'
 
EFL is good for the safety net of more matches available. That didn't help Souttar last season though.

It's such a gruelling campaign.
I've often wondered what is the ideal length comp for a player to play both club football and international football?

I've read that many of the stars of big European clubs, are too tired from a long, gruelling season when Continental Cups and World Cups take place.

The Dutch Eredivisie has 34 home and away games. I'm not sure about Cup games? Is this ideal? There are 18 clubs who play each other home and away over a season, with a break in the middle.

I think some of the Scandinavian countries play about 26 home and away games in a season.

Are some of the seasons in England and Scotland too long?
 
Are some of the seasons in England and Scotland too long?

Probably... imagine being a forward in Ange's system and pressing for 90mins twice a week maybe even another 45mins midweek? 50 games a year that's a lot KM covered. Kulusevki's running distance per game is insane. I cant see clubs continuing to play this high intensity football over such long seasons, something's gotta give.

Don't really see English lower leagues being a good place, too many games straight out of a-league and their isn't much incentive to develop overseas players due to FFP homegrown profits etc.

The CHP is heavily skewed towards the relegated PL teams as they can maintain their squad with parachute payments meaning its 10x harder for someone like Boro to compete.
 
Last edited:
Klopp pressing was more intense than Ange.
Mane didn’t burn out
Salah not
Bobby didn’t.

LaLiga has 20 clubs
SerieA 18
EPL 20
These 3 have had these numbers for yonks.
Pre EPL First Div had 22 Clubs from memory.


Throw in 2/3 Cup tournaments.
Overkill only affects the Clubs that go deep into the lot.
Also depends how deep your depth is of the squad.
FIFA are the issue adding more tournaments in the modern world and that mostly effects the top finishing clubs.
 
But Klopp's squad was deeper, tbh from my memory Mane pressed more than any of them by far.
 
EPL, Bundesliga, Serie A and Championship for the top tier of our players.

Jupiler Lig, Eredivisie and Swiss Super League for the next tier. The best places to start. My favourite tier, really interesting leagues and open minded about our guys.

I'm in two minds about whether to add Buli 2 here because its been a mixed bag for our guys in this league but it probably deserves to be there.

Danish Superliga, SPFL and J-League below these but still good. The SPFL gets a bad wrap and I feel this thread is another vehicle for that. It's a league with flaws and strengths but at least they give our guys a go.

Italy and the Balkan leagues I reckon you need heritage there.

Spain and Portugal I hate when our guys go there it almost always ends badly.

The other Euro leagues, K-League, MLS, Saudi Pro League (cringe) are in the mixer with the AL and are acceptable when it fits the player and the stage of their careers or playing qualities.
 
But Klopp's squad was deeper, tbh from my memory Mane pressed more than any of them by far.
Jas
Squad deeper yes but Klopp in the league liked using his regular starters near on every game but for injury.
Cup games naturally lots of rotation to rest the main starting 11.
The press works from all frontmen and mids - that’s how we won plenty ball in the opponents half - no way was Mane the main presser it worked right across the frontline and backed up by the mids.
Imo Ange game is nothing new all the years I’m glued to epl.
He lacks depth to maintain his plan and that’s why he keeps getting caught out with a sub standard line up to start up in the first place.
 
Back
Top