By registering with us, you'll be able to discuss, share and private message with other members of our community.
Sign Up Now!
Expecting the same here in Canberra - There are a synthetic grounds I gather that they can/will use as much as possible - priority for CF seems to be the NPL + CPL games.
Am expecting:
- NPL Youth to be split up across Nicholls and Hawker. Possibly even ANU if they can wrangle it?
- NPL + CPL + NPLW Seniors to be split up across AIS Synthetic Pitch, Melrose High, and possibly even the new one in Jerrabombera/Hume
Well.. if it’s run anything like Capital Football’s, I would expect Northern Demons to be removed.A bit potentially happening in SA's structure. Major review underway, a few rumours about what it could lead to. Maybe the amateur associations linking in to the pyramid, maybe a choice of reserves or youth teams, maybe resizing the divisions, maybe a 10 team Super League again! Some sound great, some sound stupid.
![]()
Review of Senior Men’s Competition Structure Underway
Football in South Australia has seen steady growth over the past decade, particularly in junior boys’ participation.www.footballsa.com.au
NPL games here I think are all going ahead at their normal venues (for first grade), other than the O’Connor v Yoogali game already mentionedRain has eased up here, so some pitch inspections happening tonight.
Monaro v Gungahlin confirmed still on at Riverside.
O’Connor v Yoogali has been moved from O’Connor to Hawker (synthetic)
The grounds in Wagga for CPL have been inspected and passed
Haven’t heard on anything else
Yeah linking up SAASL and Collegiate should be easy enough. Let's hope they get it done.Well.. if it’s run anything like Capital Football’s, I would expect Northern Demons to be removed.
Fortunately, I think Football SA has more sense in their brains and won’t do that.
Linking the amateur leagues would be good - the whole Saturday, Sunday and Collegiate system is very hard to follow in terms of tiers and pyramids haha
This has happened because of a merger of two clubs at the end of the 2023 season. Moreton Bay Jets were in NPL and Albany Creek Excelsior were in FQPL1. Both played and trained out of the same home ground, and obviously had some links even though they were nominally separate clubs. Although Albany Creek also had a second ground for the juniors. They merged after the 2023 season to form Moreton City Excelsior, and FQ allowed them to keep the two teams. The lower team is now in FQPL2 after being relegated in 2024. FQ seems to have an unwritten policy of encouraging clubs to merge, and it seems like part of the quid pro quo to encourage the merger was allowing MCE to keep the two senior teams in the pyramid.Just noticed Morton City has two senior teams, one in NPL and the other in FQPL2. What's going on there? The Qld NPL teams already have reserves/U23, what's this extra team Morton City has?
I know NNSW, ACT and TAS have reserves teams in their pyramid, but I thought Queensland was too good/deep for that. Certainly lowers my opinion of it slightly.
Yep pretty spot on - was confusing when I tried to do my database/spreadsheetThis has happened because of a merger of two clubs at the end of the 2023 season. Moreton Bay Jets were in NPL and Albany Creek Excelsior were in FQPL1. Both played and trained out of the same home ground, and obviously had some links even though they were nominally separate clubs. Although Albany Creek also had a second ground for the juniors. They merged after the 2023 season to form Moreton City Excelsior, and FQ allowed them to keep the two teams. The lower team is now in FQPL2 after being relegated in 2024. FQ seems to have an unwritten policy of encouraging clubs to merge, and it seems like part of the quid pro quo to encourage the merger was allowing MCE to keep the two senior teams in the pyramid.
The same thing happened at exactly the same time with Western Pride (FWPL1) and Ipswich City Bulls (FQPL4), who merged to form Ipswich FC and were allowed to keep teams in FQPL1 and FQPL4. The original two clubs did have their own separate grounds though in this case.
There was a lot of debate at the time in the FQ community about whether the new clubs should be allowed to have two teams in the pyramid, but it seems FQ’s desire to merge clubs to make the new club a bigger, stronger entity, overrode the common sense position of allowing only one team per club in the pyramid.
Great points re: travel - We’ve been doing it in Griffith for quite a while.Yeah linking up SAASL and Collegiate should be easy enough. Let's hope they get it done.
Just for comparison on the ACT travel saga... In the Limestone Coast league, clubs can travel 140 minutes or 210 kms one way to play. In the Sunday SA amateurs, clubs travel 150 minutes or 220 kms every week. This isn't NPL level, not even 2nd or 3rd divisions, these are amateur and regional leagues! In Tassie the trips can be 210 minutes or 270 kms. In the 1980s, SA teams would travel over 4 hours or 390 kms each week because Whyalla was in the league.
ACT is weak as piss. It's the NPL and they aren't taking it seriously.
Excellent knowledge. Do you think the second team will be phased out eventually? What if they end up in the same division?This has happened because of a merger of two clubs at the end of the 2023 season. Moreton Bay Jets were in NPL and Albany Creek Excelsior were in FQPL1. Both played and trained out of the same home ground, and obviously had some links even though they were nominally separate clubs. Although Albany Creek also had a second ground for the juniors. They merged after the 2023 season to form Moreton City Excelsior, and FQ allowed them to keep the two teams. The lower team is now in FQPL2 after being relegated in 2024. FQ seems to have an unwritten policy of encouraging clubs to merge, and it seems like part of the quid pro quo to encourage the merger was allowing MCE to keep the two senior teams in the pyramid.
The same thing happened at exactly the same time with Western Pride (FWPL1) and Ipswich City Bulls (FQPL4), who merged to form Ipswich FC and were allowed to keep teams in FQPL1 and FQPL4. The original two clubs did have their own separate grounds though in this case.
There was a lot of debate at the time in the FQ community about whether the new clubs should be allowed to have two teams in the pyramid, but it seems FQ’s desire to merge clubs to make the new club a bigger, stronger entity, overrode the common sense position of allowing only one team per club in the pyramid.
Just make it a normal league systme and watch it flourish. Engineering things to the lowest common denominator is dumb.A bit potentially happening in SA's structure. Major review underway, a few rumours about what it could lead to. Maybe the amateur associations linking in to the pyramid, maybe a choice of reserves or youth teams, maybe resizing the divisions, maybe a 10 team Super League again! Some sound great, some sound stupid.
![]()
Review of Senior Men’s Competition Structure Underway
Football in South Australia has seen steady growth over the past decade, particularly in junior boys’ participation.www.footballsa.com.au
The FQ Rules of Competition state that clubs are only permitted one team in any NPL or FQPL division. So if the two teams are in consecutive leagues (e.g., NPL and FQPL1, FQPL1 and FQPL2, etc) and the lower team finishes in a promotion position and the upper team doesn't, the lower team will not be promoted. If the upper team finishes in the relegation position, it will be relegated and the team in the lower league will also be relegated, regardless of the position of the team in the lower league, unless the team in the lower league finishes in a promotion position in which case the two teams will essentially swap leagues.Excellent knowledge. Do you think the second team will be phased out eventually? What if they end up in the same division?![]()