- Joined
- Oct 17, 2024
- Replies
- 3,713

- Thread Author
- #1
From Andy Howe's very nice presentation
it actually looks like you had more foreigners at the start of the nsl. Note this is not overseas born, it is overseas raised. The other interesting thing about this graph is that it looks like number of foreigners is anticorrelated with the performance of the national team

This is interesting because there have been two competing narratives - that foreigners lift the standard of the league and teach our players to go to another level vs mediocre journeymen are clogging up development pathways. Saudi's drop in form after they have imported a lot of foreigners is another interesting case study. There are so many factors that go into developing a national team, but there at least seems to be some evidence that a low fraction of foreign based players is beneficial for the national team...
it actually looks like you had more foreigners at the start of the nsl. Note this is not overseas born, it is overseas raised. The other interesting thing about this graph is that it looks like number of foreigners is anticorrelated with the performance of the national team

This is interesting because there have been two competing narratives - that foreigners lift the standard of the league and teach our players to go to another level vs mediocre journeymen are clogging up development pathways. Saudi's drop in form after they have imported a lot of foreigners is another interesting case study. There are so many factors that go into developing a national team, but there at least seems to be some evidence that a low fraction of foreign based players is beneficial for the national team...