Frankly Speaking
Impact Sub
- Joined
- Nov 16, 2024
- Replies
- 261
Ten is a black hole for ratings and Paramount is in upheaval. Because Ten is a black hole for ratings it is losing money ($322 million in the last calendar year alone), and, there has been reporting that Paramount want to divest themselves of the network. Nine offers a signficant audience and mainstream press coverage. If the APL has any ambition to grow the game, it will take a short term loss for long term gain and go with 9. Plus, the Fox experience strongly indicates that the A League needs to be paired with the EPL.What sports do channel 9 show in the AFL/NRL off-season? Aus Open, but I don't think that will class too hard and only a short tournament.
Looking back at the last Foxtel deal. $346m over six seasons, which worked out to be $5.16m per club per season. Note, this included W-League, Socceroos and Matildas as well. The final year of that deal was canned.
The P+ deal was $200 for five seasons. If we stay at 13 clubs, that's $3.17m per club per season. This excludes Socceroos and Matildas. Also, ViacomCBS purchased 2% of APL, which was about $8.4m based on what Silverlake purchased (33% of APL for $140m). FA received 10% of the first year distribution, I don't whether they take 10% every year after that as well. Also, the broadcaster later reduced the distributions after metrics weren't reached.
After all that, how much do we think Nine will chip in for A-League? They have EPL for the next three seasons, and you'd think they would renew that. Consider they were interested in A-League last bid, but it was a low-ball bid:
And this was a scary fact I learnt tonight:
There is absolutely no possibility of growing the game with Ten, whose future is uncertain regardless.