Welcome!

By registering with us, you'll be able to discuss, share and private message with other members of our community.

Sign Up Now!

Big fires in LA

If it's a stinking hot day above record temps, thats the climate changing to be hotter - as scientists have told us would happen if we carry on this way.

If it drops below average, that's also the climate changing.
What if the temps were higher 100 years ago (Sydney 1922 to 1932) ?

 
If it's a stinking hot day above record temps, thats the climate changing to be hotter - as scientists have told us would happen if we carry on this way.

If it drops below average, that's also the climate changing.

The w

I know mate. I was just dropping in to try and provide some reason, but welp, got called a fascist.
records have only been around for 100 years and monitoring stations have rarely been in the same place

it really isn't a big deal for records to be broken, its no indication of a catastrophic trend nor is it an indication humans have had anything to do with it

you seem quite gullible on this topic

you tell people to stop airing their views that you disagree with, like some dictator and you get upset when your behaviour is labelled as fascist... some self reflection is required
 
you seem quite gullible on this topic

you tell people to stop airing their views that you disagree with, like some dictator and you get upset when your behaviour is labelled as fascist... some self reflection is required
Yeah, I am. I just listen to what climate experts and scientist tell me and believe it. Next time I'll check what Andrew Bolt recommends first.

I never said stop airing your views. I just said stop attacking others who have opposing views and calling them names.

I also asked a genuine question, from which you called me a fascist. At no point have i attacked any of you right wing posters. You clearly all come on here to provoke reaction and create discord, so I asked a genuine question.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Muz
Yeah, I am. I just listen to what climate experts and scientist tell me and believe it. Next time I'll check what Andrew Bolt recommends first.

I never said stop airing your views. I just said stop attacking others who have opposing views and calling them names.

I also asked a genuine question, from which you called me a fascist. At no point have i attacked any of you right wing posters. You clearly all come on here to provoke reaction and create discord, so I asked a genuine question.
People on television are all selling something, including the 'climate experts' and 'scientists' you take as gospel without having a skerrick of understanding of science yourself. This makes those of your ilk ripe for manipulation.

I've no interest in Andrew Bolt, I don't know why you keep bringing him up.

You literally said "stop" and go away to some 'conservative' forum. Nobody attacked you, you seem to have a victim mentality.
 
When everybody is agreeing all the time and there are no provocative opinions allowed, that's called a cult.
 
Exxon's actual 1982 paper predicting global warming.

Now explain what's in it for a massive oil company to study, model, predict and then hide their results.

Where's the 'hidden agenda' for an oil company in predicting climate change?


Just like when the same mobs tried to convince everyone that lead was safe in petrol etc. The history of that is nuts. Almost mirror each other.

I wonder if back then they had the same bootlickers shilling for the petrol companies.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Muz
People on television are all selling something, including the 'climate experts' and 'scientists' you take as gospel without having a skerrick of understanding of science yourself. This makes those of your ilk ripe for manipulation.

I've no interest in Andrew Bolt, I don't know why you keep bringing him up.

You literally said "stop" and go away to some 'conservative' forum. Nobody attacked you, you seem to have a victim mentality.
Whatever, have a good day
 
Just like when the same mobs tried to convince everyone that lead was safe in petrol etc. The history of that is nuts. Almost mirror each other.

I wonder if back then they had the same bootlickers shilling for the petrol companies.

The same mobs that shilled for tobacco companies are now shilling for oil companies and using exactly the same tactics. Obfuscation, doubt, lies, repeated ad nauseum.
 
  • Like
Reactions: tsf
I would never try to convince anyone to believe in climate change or not.

But one clear observation is there are two major groups that say it's not a thing

1. People who profit from destroying the environment
2. The incredibly thick/poor;y educated.
 
This tsf chap is a fucken dunce....

Give him the dum dum hat!

100.webp
 
Back
Top