Chronicles of a stable genius - all the biggliest stuff

[johnsmith]

I've actually suspected JS of being Decentric... posting styles very similar

however I'd advise you don't give up your day job and to go moonlighting

It is so silly that Lupi thinks johnsmith is Decentric. And MSC thinks Lupi is johnsmith

You people are nuts (notice I don't assume you're all male).

I'm aware many of you look up to me for my clear thinking - but because what I stand for goes against your worldviews - you feel compelled to counter me. It's probably because inwardly you know I speak the truth. "the truth will set you free".

 

[Lupi]

It is so silly that Lupi thinks johnsmith is Decentric. And MSC thinks Lupi is johnsmith

You people are nuts (notice I don't assume you're all male).

I'm aware many of you look up to me for my clear thinking - but because what I stand for goes against your worldviews - you feel compelled to counter me. It's probably because inwardly you know I speak the truth. "the truth will set you free".

you use a lot of worn out clichés which is something I'd suspect of someone naively parodying a right wing character from a far left perspective

 

[Monoethnic Social Club]

you use a lot of worn out clichés which is something I'd suspect of someone naively parodying a right wing character from a far left perspective

HAHAHAAHAHAAHAHAAH that WINS today ... well done........

 

[Monoethnic Social Club]

It is so silly that Lupi thinks johnsmith is Decentric. And MSC thinks Lupi is johnsmith

You people are nuts (notice I don't assume you're all male).

I'm aware many of you look up to me for my clear thinking - but because what I stand for goes against your worldviews - you feel compelled to counter me. It's probably because inwardly you know I speak the truth. "the truth will set you free".

In the Sermon on the Mount (Matthew 7:15–20), Jesus warns his followers of false prophets: "Beware of false prophets, who come to you in sheep's clothing but inwardly are ravenous wolves. You will know them by their fruits. Are grapes gathered from thorns, or figs from thistles?

 

[Keeper66]

It is so silly that Lupi thinks johnsmith is Decentric. And MSC thinks Lupi is johnsmith

You people are nuts (notice I don't assume you're all male).

I'm aware many of you look up to me for my clear thinking - but because what I stand for goes against your worldviews - you feel compelled to counter me. It's probably because inwardly you know I speak the truth. "the truth will set you free".

You have now confirmed you are more than a few cornflakes short of a full packet, if you truly believe what you have written there.

 

[Muz]

You have now confirmed you are more than a few cornflakes short of a full packet, if you truly believe what you have written there.

BAHAHAHAHAHA. I almost quoted the same line when I read it too. FMD.

 

[johnsmith]

You have now confirmed you are more than a few cornflakes short of a full packet, if you truly believe what you have written there.

“It is not the critic who counts, not the man who points out how the strong man stumbled, or where the doer of deeds could have done them better. The credit belongs to the man who is actually in the arena, whose face is marred by dust and sweat and blood; who strives valiantly, who errs and comes short again and again; who knows the great enthusiasms, the great devotions, and spends himself in a worthy cause; who at the best knows in the end the triumph of high achievement and who at the worst, if he fails, at least he fails while daring greatly, so that his place shall never be with those cold and timid souls who know neither victory nor defeat.”​

​

(Theodore Roosevelt's 1910 speech at the Sorbonne)​

 

[Lupi]

"There is an attempt to substitute concepts. Because we are not talking about allowing or prohibiting the Kiev regime from striking at Russian territory. He already does. With the help of unmanned aerial vehicles and other means. But when it comes to the use of high-precision long-range weapons of Western production, this is a completely different story.

The fact is that the Ukrainian army is not able to strike with modern high-precision long-range systems of Western production. She can't do that. This is possible only with the use of intelligence from satellites that Ukraine does not have, this is data only from satellites of the European Union or the United States… From NATO satellites. This is the first. The second — and very important, maybe key - is that only NATO military personnel can, in fact, contribute flight missions to these missile systems. Ukrainian servicemen cannot do this.

And so it's not about allowing the Ukrainian regime to strike at Russia with these weapons, or not to allow it, it's about deciding whether NATO countries are directly involved in a military conflict or not. If this decision is made, it will mean nothing more than the direct participation of NATO countries — the United States, European countries — in the war on Ukraine… And this already significantly changes the very essence, the very nature of the conflict. And if this is the case, then, bearing in mind the change in the very essence of this conflict, we will make appropriate decisions based on the threats that will be created for us," Putin said.

Подробнее: https://eadaily.com/en/news/2024/11...ing-kiev-to-strike-deep-into-russia-zakharova

ie WWIII

 

[Lupi]

how many of you are on BlueSky?

 

[johnsmith]

Since you (Far) Lefties get triggered by articles from The Gateway Pundit website, here's a thinking man's article about Trump's Dream Team.

The Trump Dream Team

The 1992 Summer Olympics in Barcelona was the first games in which professional basketball players were allowed to participate. Previously, college players competed against the professional national teams of the Soviet Union and other countries. I...

www.americanthinker.com

 

[Keeper66]

“It is not the critic who counts, not the man who points out how the strong man stumbled, or where the doer of deeds could have done them better. The credit belongs to the man who is actually in the arena, whose face is marred by dust and sweat and blood; who strives valiantly, who errs and comes short again and again; who knows the great enthusiasms, the great devotions, and spends himself in a worthy cause; who at the best knows in the end the triumph of high achievement and who at the worst, if he fails, at least he fails while daring greatly, so that his place shall never be with those cold and timid souls who know neither victory nor defeat.”​

​

(Theodore Roosevelt's 1910 speech at the Sorbonne)​

When you find yourself in a hole, stop digging.

(Original source unknown)

 

[Monoethnic Social Club]

“It is not the critic who counts, not the man who points out how the strong man stumbled, or where the doer of deeds could have done them better. The credit belongs to the man who is actually in the arena, whose face is marred by dust and sweat and blood; who strives valiantly, who errs and comes short again and again; who knows the great enthusiasms, the great devotions, and spends himself in a worthy cause; who at the best knows in the end the triumph of high achievement and who at the worst, if he fails, at least he fails while daring greatly, so that his place shall never be with those cold and timid souls who know neither victory nor defeat.”​

​

(Theodore Roosevelt's 1910 speech at the Sorbonne)​

 

[johnsmith]

A question for you all - I really want to know how you think ...

The Biden Department of Justice (federal level) investigated the sexual allegation against Matt Gaetz that he had sex with a minor. And you know that if the Biden DOJ had found anything of substance, they would have sought to destroy Gaetz. But the Department of Justice found nothing, and didn't press charges.

But, as you know, in the rats nest of dirty politics, the Democrats started their own investigation in the House of Congress's ethics committee. They've stretched it out for 2 years, which helped them say for 2 years that "Gaetz is under ethics investigation".

Given that the partisan Department of Justice dropped the case, why are you so quick to see Gaetz as a sexual predator? (Some of you have written that, accusing him).

In my worldview, where a person is innocent until proven guilty, for me, the most extreme I could take is to remain neutral until facts and evidence emerge.

I cannot bring myself to form a negative opinion, until I see facts and evidence either for or against.

Whereas we live in a culture where the Media slanders people, and the common folk (that's you) just believe the Media. I find it helpful to interact with you lot, because it trains me to understand how typical people (like you) in society act in these matters, i.e. they bring out the pitchforks at the slightest hint from the Media. You lot have taught me that the average Aussie, in 2024, is not a fair-minded, justice-focused person, like previous generations of Australians were more so.

This is why, for me, facts and evidence are all-important. And it's what leads me even to the 6,000 year issue (as Muz will be quick to remind) ... facts and evidence.

The 6,000 year issue is proof that people like Muz operate -- not on facts/evidence -- but on an automatic-assumption mode. i.e. if someone says something that totally jarrs his worldview - rather than testing facts and evidence - he switches to automatic-judgment mode to say it is totally ridiculous. For Muz, when something is so overwhelmingly ridiculous, he switches to automatic-judgment, no need for examining facts/evidence. I see that Muz is typical of the majority of Australians, am I correct?

NEW: Leftist Florida Lawyer Wheeled Out to Attack Matt Gaetz, Keep Debunked Claims of Sexual Misconduct Alive Despite Biden's DOJ Finding Nothing | The Gateway Pundit | by Jordan Conradson

A local Florida attorney is reviving accusations against Trump’s Attorney General pick, Matt Gaetz, in a last-ditch effort to harm his chances of assuming his new role. As The Gateway Pundit reported, the mainstream media has launched an all-out public assassination on Matt Gaetz following his...

www.thegatewaypundit.com

 

[tsf]

Brexit 2.0

. But the Department of Justice found nothing,

You do not know that.

 

[johnsmith]

Brexit 2.0


You do not know that.

The Biden DOJ dropped the case. If the Democrat-controlled DOJ had found even a smithereen against Gaetz, they would have milked it for all it's worth - as they've done in so many lawfare cases.

Consider this logic:

- bringing false law-fare cases against political opponents is lawlessness, which is what the Leftist DOJ has done for 8 years. (e.g. the Russia-collusion hoax accusing Trump of being a Russian spy).

- bringing accountability to what the DOJ has done is not "retribution". It is justice.

- Matt Gaetz was nominated by Trump to clean out the DOJ.

- What do you think the Democrat-controlled Media will do and say?



For those who don't know ... Hillary Clinton paid a firm named Fusion GPS to find dirt on Trump. Fusion paid an ex-spy named Christopher Steele to find dirt on Trump. Steele fabricated a fake-report (known as the Steele Dossier). The Durham Report dated May 12, 2023, stated that the FBI knew full well that the Steele Dossier was fake. But the FBI used that fake dossier to request permission from the F.I.S.A. court to spy on Trump. And the FBI used that fake Steele dossier several times to obtain extensions to keep spying on Trump, even when he was President in his 1st term.

And now when Trump says he's going to dismantle the rats nest in the FBI, CIA and DOJ, the Media covers for them saying Trump is seeking retribution against his political enemies.

 

[johnsmith]

The coming of Donald Trump on the political landscape has blown the lid of where each person stands. Previously, anyone who was fun at a party was suitable as pal. But now, with Trump being so contentious, you can instantly tell what people's inner worldviews are.

Same for RFK Jr. See how the New York Times are attacking him. And, as with Trump, the RFKJr thing is helping sift out people's worldviews.

From what I know of you lot - from the megathread on the previous website - my prediction is most of you are on the anti-RFK bandwagon because he is said to be "anti-vax". That's enough for you to be against him.

For those of you who won't bother reading this link below, the NYTimes attacked RFKJr, but in doing so, admitted that the food sold in the U.S. is crammed with artificial colourings, whereas the Canadian version had natural colourings.

NYT Fact-Checks Itself In Fact Check Of RFK Cereal Claims

The New York Times fact-checked itself in an embarrassing attempt to fact-check Donald Trump's HHS pick, Robert F. Kennedy, Jr.

thefederalist.com

 

[tsf]

The Biden DOJ dropped the case. If the Democrat-controlled DOJ had found even a smithereen against Gaetz, they would have milked it for all it's worth - as they've done in so many lawfare cases.

Consider this logic:

- bringing false law-fare cases against political opponents is lawlessness, which is what the Leftist DOJ has done for 8 years. (e.g. the Russia-collusion hoax accusing Trump of being a Russian spy).

- bringing accountability to what the DOJ has done is not "retribution". It is justice.

- Matt Gaetz was nominated by Trump to clean out the DOJ.

- What do you think the Democrat-controlled Media will do and say?



For those who don't know ... Hillary Clinton paid a firm named Fusion GPS to find dirt on Trump. Fusion paid an ex-spy named Christopher Steele to find dirt on Trump. Steele fabricated a fake-report (known as the Steele Dossier). The Durham Report dated May 12, 2023, stated that the FBI knew full well that the Steele Dossier was fake. But the FBI used that fake dossier to request permission from the F.I.S.A. court to spy on Trump. And the FBI used that fake Steele dossier several times to obtain extensions to keep spying on Trump, even when he was President in his 1st term.

And now when Trump says he's going to dismantle the rats nest in the FBI, CIA and DOJ, the Media covers for them saying Trump is seeking retribution against his political enemies.

1. They have declined to press charges. Does not mean he is either guilty or not guilty. His own members of his party have said he had sex with a minor. If not true then sue for defamation? Surely you 'd like to see the report from his own party? I am not saying he did it or not - I wasn't there and haven;t read the report,but lets not forget his dad is the Repulican swamp in Florida. And just the other day the child's lawyer said release the report and she said she witnessed him having sex/doing drugs with underage girl.

2. The russia collusion was not a hoax. The was no evidence trump was involved but there have been multiple charges and evidence of Russia tampering with the election and using people within the US.

 

[tsf]

From what I know of you lot - from the megathread on the previous website - my prediction is most of you are on the anti-RFK bandwagon because he is said to be "anti-vax". That's enough for you to be against him.

I think it's great. It's going to be Brexit 2.0 all over again. All these thick-as-fuck idiots regretting their decision after their lives only got worse once they swallowed all this bullshit from the right being on their side and looking out for them.

I just hope all of trump's picks get approved. Every person in his cabinet only has something like an 8% chance of staying on based on all the other falling outs. Let the circus begin.

 

[Lupi]

2. The russia collusion was not a hoax. The was no evidence trump was involved but there have been multiple charges and evidence of Russia tampering with the election and using people within the US.

bullshit

charges prove nothing and $40k of social media ads is chump change

if there's no evidence of Trump involvement there is no collusion

the entire episode was a lawfare and entrapment operation initiated and paid for by the Clinton campaign with help from the British and Alexander Downer.

 

[johnsmith]

His own members of his party have said he had sex with a minor.

2. The russia collusion was not a hoax. The was no evidence trump was involved but there have been multiple charges and evidence of Russia tampering with the election and using people within the US.

You realise it's not Democrat vs Republican? It's the corrupt system vs the change-agents. Both R and D have corruption. Trump's own R party contains some of his greatest enemies.

The Muller investigation was not against the general concept of Russian influence. It was specifically to nail Trump as being a Russian spy. To say otherwise is the grossest Leftist spin. The Left used the Muller investigation to tie Trump up for 3 years. In spite of Leftist use of the legal system to destroy Trump, he still managed to get the economy roaring.

In Trump's 1st term he wanted to instantly build the border wall, but his enemies from both R and D opposed him. And when Biden took over, they sold off the metal parts of the uncompleted wall for pittance, to prevent the wall being constructed. And then they let in 10+ million illegals coming through the gaps in the wall.