Chronicles of a stable genius - all the biggliest stuff

[johnsmith]

And your point is …….?

I’m assuming you have a point with this comment. Big assumption I know, based on your history.

The point I was making, by that comment, was responding directly to Muz's comment - which I quoted. If you track back to Muz's comment, you might see the connection of what I was responding to.

You sound like a mobster who calls for people's head without bothering to do any prior research, or just simple checking a thread of prior discussions.

 

[Keeper66]

The point I was making, by that comment, was responding directly to Muz's comment - which I quoted. If you track back to Muz's comment, you might see the connection of what I was responding to.

You sound like a mobster who calls for people's head without bothering to do any prior research, or just simple checking a thread of prior discussions.

I read Muz's comment. It is clear what his point was. I want to know what point you were making with your comment. Muz said sexual assault doesn't equal homosexuality. Are you saying that because Jones is accused of sexual assaults against men that sexual assault does equal homosexuality?

 

[johnsmith]

"Paper-Shredding Truck Spotted Outside Department of Justice Building Days After Trump Announces Matt Gaetz Attorney General Nomination"

What's Going On Here? Paper-Shredding Truck Spotted Outside Department of Justice Building Days After Trump Announces Matt Gaetz Attorney General Nomination | The Gateway Pundit | by Cullen Linebarger

The news of President Trump’s return to the Oval Office and his excellent cabinet nominations may be causing Biden Deep State officials to undertake desperate measures to evade accountability.

www.thegatewaypundit.com

 

[johnsmith]

I read Muz's comment. It is clear what his point was. I want to know what point you were making with your comment. Muz said sexual assault doesn't equal homosexuality. Are you saying that because Jones is accused of sexual assaults against men that sexual assault does equal homosexuality?

What is your opinion on that, and what are the reasons for you taking that opinion?

You asked a question, I answered. Now I am interested in your view - because every person frames questions based on their worldview. So I want to know what is your worldview that makes you say what you do.

 

[Keeper66]

What is your opinion on that, and what are the reasons for you taking that opinion?

You asked a question, I answered. Now I am interested in your view - because every person frames questions based on their worldview. So I want to know what is your worldview that makes you say what you do.

No you didn't answer the question. If you answer the question openly without dancing around with a lot of words that doesn't answer the question, I will give you my opinion. My question is, are you saying that because Jones is accused of sexual assaults against men that sexual assault does equal homosexuality?

To clarify what I expect from you in answering that question, imagine you are a witness in court and you are being asked that question. You are required to give an honest and clear answer.

 

[johnsmith]

No you didn't answer the question. If you answer the question openly without dancing around with a lot of words that doesn't answer the question, I will give you my opinion. My question is, are you saying that because Jones is accused of sexual assaults against men that sexual assault does equal homosexuality?

To clarify what I expect from you in answering that question, imagine you are a witness in court and you are being asked that question. You are required to give an honest and clear answer.

What's your view?

 

[Muz]

No you didn't answer the question. If you answer the question openly without dancing around with a lot of words that doesn't answer the question, I will give you my opinion. My question is, are you saying that because Jones is accused of sexual assaults against men that sexual assault does equal homosexuality?

To clarify what I expect from you in answering that question, imagine you are a witness in court and you are being asked that question. You are required to give an honest and clear answer.

He's the Jordan Peterson of this forum.

 

[Muz]

No you didn't answer the question. If you answer the question openly without dancing around with a lot of words that doesn't answer the question, I will give you my opinion. My question is, are you saying that because Jones is accused of sexual assaults against men that sexual assault does equal homosexuality?

To clarify what I expect from you in answering that question, imagine you are a witness in court and you are being asked that question. You are required to give an honest and clear answer.

To clarify I was trying to make the point that just because we don't like someone who's committed sexual assault doesn't mean we're homophobic because he happens to be a homosexual.

We're anti-sexual assault not homophobic.

I can't believe fuckwits (not you) need this explained to them.

 

[tsf]

We're anti-sexual assault not homophobic.

I can't believe fuckwits (not you) need this explained to them.

Hilarious that the alt-right are framing it like this. But predictable

Never mind the fact that he's written love letters to school boys and also been accused of touching up adolescents in his care (he can have his day in court)




Quick look! There's a drag queen - stop them before they destroy our children

 

[johnsmith]

Keeping to the topic of this thread - Trump - just to ensure you all are up to speed on the details:

The 34 felonies were actually 34 separate instalment-payments for hush money.

Usually, such actions are regarded as misdemeanours. You do realise, don't you, that people usually don't go to jail for paying hush money to women.

In order for the New York D.A. to convert them from misdemeanours to felonies, he had to link the actions to some other crime.

The sad thing is -- which you won't hear on Mainstream Media, but only in conservative media -- is that neither New York judge Merchan nor Attorney General Alvin Bragg - they did not define what that crime was. This has caused lawyers to deem the New York trial as -- apologies to Aussies - as a kangaroo court, because if violates the basic principle of justice: that to charge a person, you have to inform them of the crime they are alleged to have committed. This didn't happen in the sham trial in NY.

The Mainstream Media has milked this to slur Trump as a felon, but it has been always the probable outcome that the appeals court would overturn this, because of the lack of defining what the crime was, which was linked to the 34 acts of hush-money payments.

The average bloke doesn't care for this. All they see is the Media saying Trump was convicted of 34 felonies, and they are ready to throw stones. This is why I perceive that the current generation of Australians are not as fair-minded and just, compared to people of former generations of Australians.

 

[johnsmith]

He's the Jordan Peterson of this forum.

Why would anyone think it is an insult to be likened to Jordan Peterson?

 

[Muz]

Why would anyone think it is an insult to be likened to Jordan Peterson?

I asked AI to reply to your question in the manner of how Jordan Peterson would. (It couldn't be more bang on.)

I just love how it threw in 'truth seeker' as well. No less than in the opening paragraph.


Such a compact little question, and yet, brimming with unexamined assumptions. Let’s break it down like the responsible truth-seekers we ought to be.

First, the "why"—a direct appeal to causality. It implies there’s some hidden psychological or cultural mechanism at work here, something driving this purported insult. A fine start.

Then we have “would anyone think,” which is curious phrasing, isn’t it? It suggests that such a thought—such a perceived slight—is a real phenomenon, worthy of exploration. But embedded within it is the faint whiff of incredulity. Almost as if the author can scarcely believe anyone would stoop so low as to harbor such an idea. How fascinating.

Now to the meat of it: “it is an insult to be likened to Jordan Peterson.” Well, first of all, notice the phrasing—“an insult.” That’s a value judgment, isn’t it? To be likened to someone, to have a comparison drawn, is, in essence, a neutral act. The insult arises not from the act itself but from the cultural or personal baggage attached to it. Interesting.

Finally, the object of this likening: “Jordan Peterson.” A lightning rod of controversy, to put it mildly. The name alone is a Rorschach test for ideological alignment. Depending on your worldview, it’s either a compliment, an insult, or perhaps a revelation of your own intellectual fragility if such a comparison rattles you.

So, why would anyone think it’s an insult? Well, it depends on what they fear. Perhaps it’s the fear of responsibility, or of being called out for living in chaos, or—perish the thought—of grappling with the very truths they’d rather avoid. The question, as always, says far more about the asker than the answer ever could.

 

[tsf]

He's referred to as 'The dumb person's smart person'

Don't shoot the messenger!

 

[Muz]

He's referred to as 'The dumb person's smart person'

Don't shoot the messenger!

It depends by what you mean 'messenger'.

 

[Muz]

"Paper-Shredding Truck Spotted Outside Department of Justice Building Days After Trump Announces Matt Gaetz Attorney General Nomination"

What's Going On Here? Paper-Shredding Truck Spotted Outside Department of Justice Building Days After Trump Announces Matt Gaetz Attorney General Nomination | The Gateway Pundit | by Cullen Linebarger

The news of President Trump’s return to the Oval Office and his excellent cabinet nominations may be causing Biden Deep State officials to undertake desperate measures to evade accountability.

www.thegatewaypundit.com

More easily debunkable garbage.

 

[johnsmith]

So, why would [Muz] think it’s an insult [to be likened to Jordan Peterson]? Well, it depends on what [Muz] fear. Perhaps it’s [Muz's] fear of responsibility, or of [Muz] being called out for living in chaos, or—perish the thought—of [Muz] grappling with the very truths [he or she would] rather avoid.

Muz, in adapting the A.I. quote you copied, I have not assumed you are male - since that I don't want to insult females who use male-pseudonyms on social media. Some of your reasoning is not typically male - so I am not in a position to assume.

 

[tsf]

More easily debunkable garbage.

View attachment 307

We've got a paper shredding machine in my office. What are they hiding?

 

[Lupi]

Morons here babbling about nothing while Biden takes us to the brink of nuclear war.

Majority of the left are already depressed so they'd probably welcome it.

 

[Muz]

Russia complaining this morning about Ukraine bombing them. The fucking chutzpah to complain about a country you invaded shooting back at you.

And as for WW3. Russia will get their arses absolutely handed to them.

America and the rest of Europe have been watching all of this go down on satellite from their cozy little chairs watching what a pathetic rabble the Russian war effort has been to date. Watching, learning, feeding GPS coordinates to Ukraine about what target to hit next, laughing at their outdated equipment and their logistics nightmare. (Wait until Ukraine starts hitting a few transport hubs, airfields and rail lines.).

They can't even invade one country let alone if they took on Europe and the US.

The only thing the cunts have got is fucktons more people than the Ukraine that they give no fucks about. That's the only thing that's keeping this thing going otherwise it'd have been over 2 years ago..

 

[Lupi]

Russia complaining this morning about Ukraine bombing them. The fucking chutzpah to complain about a country you invaded shooting back at you.

And as for WW3. Russia will get their arses absolutely handed to them.

America and the rest of Europe have been watching all of this go down on satellite from their cozy little chairs watching what a pathetic rabble the Russian war effort has been to date. Watching, learning, feeding GPS coordinates to Ukraine about what target to hit next, laughing at their outdated equipment and their logistics nightmare. (Wait until Ukraine starts hitting a few transport hubs, airfields and rail lines.).

They can't even invade one country let alone if they took on Europe and the US.

The only thing the cunts have got is fucktons more people than the Ukraine that they give no fucks about. That's the only thing that's keeping this thing going otherwise it'd have been over 2 years ago..

what business is Ukraine of yours?