Conspiracy theories

[Keeper66]

Let me analyse this in a logical fashion.

I asked "Can the resurrection be supported by sound reasoning"?

In this case, you gave a conclusion to your answer (after only one short paragraph of word salad, which must be a record for you), which stated "Hence, whether Christ is the only way ... or whether Christianity is the biggest delusion ... all hinges on the Resurrection of Christ being literally and historically true."

So in essence you have said the sound reasoning supporting the resurrection all hinges on the resurrection being literally and historically true. Or in other words, the resurrection is true if it is true. What a compelling argument!

Hey johnsmith!!! You haven't explained this one yet.

 

[johnsmith]

The facts are Trump fomented a riot/insurrection where MAGA idiots trashed the capitol building and 6 people died. Subsequently more than 460 people were jailed in relation to that.

Zero of those were Antifa. ZERO. Maybe someone like yourself who is so oblivious to facts and evidence should sit this one out.

Or do 'your people' know something we don't?

Muz, this entire topic of J6 hinges on the person - expressing the viewpoint -- whether they know the definition and meaning of the legal term, "lack of standing".

If you, Muz, do you comprehend the meaning of the legal term "lack of standing" -- nothing will make sense about J6.

The definition of "lack of standing" is not a matter of opinion where one person's view is as good as another. The term "lack of standing" (or, locus standii ). It's like an engineer knowing the definitions of basic words, such as force, mass, moment, stress, load, axis, shear etc. Without basic vocabulary, you cannot communicate ideas.

Hence, J6 won't make sense --- and you'll be vulnerable to the Media's lies -- if you don't familiarise yourself with the basic vocabulary term, "lack of standing".

 

[Lupi]

this is what you saw Muz... bless

 

[Keeper66]

Glad you have finally worked it out, I'm sure I, and many others on here, have superior intelligence to you. But I would never attempt to guess what your intended statement is, the workings of your warped mind are beyond my understanding.

Again however, you fail to address all the questions. What about the incomprehensibility of the THEN part in the second IF-THEN statement. What is your typo or copy-paste error there, or is there something else that you expect of me in analysing the garbage that continually sprouts from your keyboard.

Hey johnsmith. You haven't explained this one yet either. Come on, keep up.

 

[johnsmith]

Hey johnsmith. You haven't explained this one yet either. Come on, keep up.

Would you be willing to watch this documentary, and then I'll discuss it with you?

Even for me to write a short reply, it cannot compress 5 years worth of information into a short few sentences.

Official "Let My People Go" Full Length Documentary

Download your own free copy or purchase DVDs at https://frankspeech.com/LetMyPeopleGo March 30, 1863 Abraham Lincoln's Proclamation 97—Appointing a Day of National Humiliation, Fasting, and Prayer A P

rumble.com

And, as I said to Muz, you need to look up the definition of the legal term "lack of standing" or "locus standii". It does not mean there was no credible evidence.

 

[Keeper66]

Would you be willing to watch this documentary, and then I'll discuss it with you?

Even for me to write a short reply, it cannot compress 5 years worth of information into a short few sentences.

Official "Let My People Go" Full Length Documentary

Download your own free copy or purchase DVDs at https://frankspeech.com/LetMyPeopleGo March 30, 1863 Abraham Lincoln's Proclamation 97—Appointing a Day of National Humiliation, Fasting, and Prayer A P

rumble.com

And, as I said to Muz, you need to look up the definition of the legal term "lack of standing" or "locus standii". It does not mean there was no credible evidence.

No I'm not willing to watch the propaganda you put up here. And it has nothing to do with "lack of standing" or any of the other stuff you keep trying to fall back on to back up your pathetic views.

I asked you to explain your incomprehensible answer with the two IF-THEN examples you gave. Make your answer comprehensible. I'm not arguing with you on the validity of your answer. I can't, because it is nonsensical gibberish. If you can't explain things in comprehensible language, then give over with the crap you are espousing.

Either put up or shut up.

 

[johnsmith]

No I'm not willing to watch the propaganda you put up here. And it has nothing to do with "lack of standing" or any of the other stuff you keep trying to fall back on to back up your pathetic views.

I asked you to explain your incomprehensible answer with the two IF-THEN examples you gave. Make your answer comprehensible. I'm not arguing with you on the validity of your answer. I can't, because it is nonsensical gibberish. If you can't explain things in comprehensible language, then give over with the crap you are espousing.

Either put up or shut up.

For me to dialogue with you on this, I need you to come up to speed on background information. Otherwise, it's like you're just trying to corner me with insults - rather than us sharing information as mature adults (I assume you're not a teenie bopper).

 

[Keeper66]

For me to dialogue with you on this, I need you to come up to speed on background information. Otherwise, it's like you're just trying to corner me with insults - rather than us sharing information as mature adults (I assume you're not a teenie bopper).

No, it's purely about making your original answer comprehensible so I can understand it. Go back and look at you original answer, the one where you used two IF-THEN statements, read it back carefully to yourself (read what you have written, not what you think you have written) and then fix it so it makes sense from an English language perspective. If you do this and make it comprehensible, then we can argue about the validity of your views.

 

[johnsmith]

ok.

IF the 2020 U.S. election was not influenced by election-fraud THEN the J6 protesters can be seen as merely exercising their right to peaceful demonstration. There are video clips of Capitol police, in and outside the building, waving the crowd in, like traffic cops guiding the people to enter the Capitol. There is also evidence of FBI and anti-Trump elements, dressed to appear as Trump supporters, committing acts of violence. Why would the Democrats want the violence to happen? To nail Trump, as they have done in the last 4 years for being an insurrectionist.

IF the true result of the 2020 U.S. election's result was that Trump won - but the result was rigged by election fraud - see massive evidence -- THEN the J6 protestors are the ultimate patriots, and not just deserving to be pardoned by Trump, but to be given the highest honour of the Medal of Freedom. These J6 protestors have been jailed and TORTURED like in Soviet Gulag prisons.

And if you think that all the 60+ cases were thrown out by the courts because of pathetically poor or non-existent evidence, go look up the definition of "lack of standing".

It matters whether you are a person who can focus on facts and evidence, even in the face of massive propaganda.

 

[Keeper66]

ok.

IF the 2020 U.S. election was not influenced by election-fraud THEN the J6 protesters can be seen as merely exercising their right to peaceful demonstration. There are video clips of Capitol police, in and outside the building, waving the crowd in, like traffic cops guiding the people to enter the Capitol. There is also evidence of FBI and anti-Trump elements, dressed to appear as Trump supporters, committing acts of violence. Why would the Democrats want the violence to happen? To nail Trump, as they have done in the last 4 years for being an insurrectionist.

IF the true result of the 2020 U.S. election's result was that Trump won - but the result was rigged by election fraud - see massive evidence -- THEN the J6 protestors are the ultimate patriots, and not just deserving to be pardoned by Trump, but to be given the highest honour of the Medal of Freedom. These J6 protestors have been jailed and TORTURED like in Soviet Gulag prisons.

And if you think that all the 60+ cases were thrown out by the courts because of pathetically poor or non-existent evidence, go look up the definition of "lack of standing".

It matters whether you are a person who can focus on facts and evidence, even in the face of massive propaganda.

OK, you have now made it comprehensible, it's a pity it has taken so long for you to do so. I assume you picked up the errors you made in your first missive that made it hard to understand, and I accept your projected thanks for assisting you to correct that.

On to the assertion that the protestors were either demonstrating peacefully or were the ultimate patriots, and my belief based on the evidence I have seen and read is that the election wasn't rigged and the demonstration was unlawfully violent - see massive evidence.

 

[Muz]

Lol. 'Tortured'.


Hahahahaha. The flog is the gift that keeps on giving.

 

[Muz]

There is also evidence of FBI and anti-Trump elements, dressed to appear as Trump supporters, committing acts of violence.

This is an amazing claim. Put up this 'evidence' and prove it.

 

[melbcityguy]

Lads let's leave out the name-calling let's just debate

Join in or bugger off.

Piss off ya bugger

 

[johnsmith]

Hey johnsmith. You haven't explained this one yet either. Come on, keep up.

This is a movie based on the book. It's the journey of an investigative journalist in legal matters, who sought to debunk Christianity in order to save his wife from Christianity. In the process of investigating the evidence, he was persuaded of the truth of the gospel of Jesus Christ.

 

[johnsmith]

This is an amazing claim. Put up this 'evidence' and prove it.

 

[Muz]

Lads let's leave out the name-calling let's just debate

Piss off ya bugger

Mate if you're not contributing then scroll on.

 

[Muz]

This is a movie based on the book. It's the journey of an investigative journalist in legal matters, who sought to debunk Christianity in order to save his wife from Christianity. In the process of investigating the evidence, he was persuaded of the truth of the gospel of Jesus Christ.

Well case closed keeper66. A movie. Shut the door it's all over.

 

[Lupi]

Plenty of videos of Antifa weasels breaking into the Capitol building. While the police ushered in the Trump supporters.

 

[return_to_sender]

This is a movie based on the book. It's the journey of an investigative journalist in legal matters, who sought to debunk Christianity in order to save his wife from Christianity. In the process of investigating the evidence, he was persuaded of the truth of the gospel of Jesus Christ.

I'm a YT creator on the side and know a bit about how this all works.

It's great that your troll account is promoting this video in places where it won't be watched. That's because it harms the CTR (click through rate) on video impressions. The number goes down, so YT algo recommends it even less because it has less confidence that showing the video thumbnail will convert to a view. Maybe later I'll copy paste the link into Tor and watch about 6 second of it. You know, really bury it with low AVD (viewer retention) as well.

Thanks for letting me know about a video I'll never watch in my life. Keep up the good work.

 

[Lupi]

I'm a YT creator on the side and know a bit about how this all works.

It's great that your troll account is promoting this video in places where it won't be watched. That's because it harms the CTR (click through rate) on video impressions. The number goes down, so YT algo recommends it even less because it has less confidence that showing the video thumbnail will convert to a view. Maybe later I'll copy paste the link into Tor and watch about 6 second of it. You know, really bury it with low AVD (viewer retention) as well.

Thanks for letting me know about a video I'll never watch in my life. Keep up the good work.

oh boy