Usually for these things, it's a "Home" and "Away" full set. When it comes to small changes like that, it's generally a flip of the coin who is the one that changes the socks (or alternatively the shorts has happened before)
Like I said, get the belt out...That was a shooting masterclass...Oh well, a point is a point.. lets see what next week brings.
I'd still prefer Baccus there but happy to see Metcalfe tried in that role.
I think Gauci had blocked view from Saudi player?
That's a bingo
Don't think so,,, On the replay Gauci was nowhere near it anyway.... Lets just chalk it down to a "gift" from the football gods and move on...
ball was deflected by (Souttar I think from memory) and the Saudi played was onside anyway. by Irvine...... ??? At least thats what I think I saw... wonder why no VAR lines on broadcast?
Probably should add on - looked like to me there was a mix of being in the line of sight of Gauci, and also the shot had gone directly past the offside play, moving only his foot out of the way to let the shot through.
Agreed, they defended very well at times....
Your probably right.. still think it was a "borderline" ofside call anyway some lines on the replay would have helped clarify at least.
Deflections don't put players onside anymore (if it's considered a save/block on goal)
Sure, but I think (without any frame of reference) that he was onside before the shot anyway.
Before the shot, probably - I'll have to rewind and take a look. But this is what they would have looked at (being offside at the shot - hence the line of sight of Gauci reference)
yeah that does look damning... I agree.. fair call then... can you click forward to see whose legs it went through though, I seem to remember it being bottom left corner?
Cameron Burgess (directly in front of the shot), and then to the offside attacker.
Agreed.
