Quicky
Fan Favourite
- Joined
- Oct 17, 2024
- Replies
- 1,481

The formation and system Popa uses actually aligns with those who think our playing skill and quality is not up to open, competitive football - as discussed in depth many times over the years.
Those who say we have to play defensively and score on the counter because we do not have the cattle to play any other way might be seeing something akin to the perfect Australian national football model under Popa. 7 defensively focussed and selected out field players and 3 dynamic attacking players.
Each part of the system can operate in isolation of the other - so we can throw everything our 3 forwards have into attacking knowing that the 7 defenders are safely guarding our behinds.
I don't like playing overly defensive, countering football (zzzzzzz) but Popa is generating and, so far, maintaining that 3 player attacking threat and I am finding it quite entertaining and satisfying to watch so far.
It's good if we go quickly when we counter. That I think we must do and be brave about it.
I think we also have some other avenues to goal through Irvine and also set pieces so we aren't only reliant on the front three.
I think it puts our 2 CMs under a lot of pressure and against stronger teams we can get shut down easily when pressed, which is why Popovic had us bypassing the press with long balls. We'd be better at this with Souttar, Circati and Triantis imo, good long balls.
It also relies on our wing backs providing width. I think Behich is too conservative and Miller lacks technique and is a brain fart risk defensively. Though Miller adds a set piece threat. It'd be better with Bos and there is no good RWB atm.
I don't like that our inverted wingers shuts out talent like Irankunda and is less suitable for Goodwin, our best attacking players.
I think offensively against good teams this system is just too hard for us to score. But I'd like to see it with our best XI.