By registering with us, you'll be able to discuss, share and private message with other members of our community.
Sign Up Now!Sounds like a very decent intelligence operation then.So apparently Russian truck drivers were contracted, on false pretences, to deliver these drones and drop them off.
All the 'arrests' so far have been of Russian truck drivers who had no idea what they were doing.
So apparently Russian truck drivers were contracted, on false pretences, to deliver these drones and drop them off.
All the 'arrests' so far have been of Russian truck drivers who had no idea what they were doing.
On the surface yes, but it will just harden their stance. The Russian mindset is not inclined to be taken advantage of in such humiliating circumstances. Nobody should want escalation but this is what we're going to getAnyone with basic military knowledge knows russia got embarrassed and fucked.
but it will just harden their stance.
So, don't attack them as a means of defending your nation in case you upset them and they...they...attack you more?
Russia has already shown it's incredibly weaker than they pretended. The amount of red lines they keep drawing are so far in the distance behind us we can't see the beginning anymore.
The russian pilots can be happy for the next twenty years while they wait for their new plane to get made
It will harden their stance not to find a diplomatic solution to this war. Probably should have been more specific.So, don't attack them as a means of defending your nation in case you upset them and they...they...attack you more?
Russian military primary and secondary suppliers are generally themselves, China, India, Iran and North Korea.The russian pilots can be happy for the next twenty years while they wait for their new plane to get made
Now that the dust is starting to settle (literally) on the Ukrainian 'Spider's Web' drone bombing of these Russia's Air Force assets, the recklessness of the operation is really starting to emerge.
It's obvious that this operation was 'helped along' by external forces, most likely French or British military intelligence. My money is probably on the British. MI6's finger prints are all over this war. And while the French are sneaky they're not this sneaky.
The military planes attacked were mostly Soviet era bombers, reasonably good pieces of kit which had obviously been modernised but not great. Capable of launching nuclear weapons, yes, but certainly not sophisticated enough to do mass damage to your Western European nations, if required to do so. Now, all Russia will do is replace this hardware with new technological advanced military aeroplanes. Probably constructed in China who will only be pleased to provide financial assistance to pay for the deal.
This new technology will only improve the long term capabilities of Russian Air Force attacks if and when they decide to further develop their incursions into their former Soviet states and beyond.
In conclusion, by facilitating the Ukranian 'Spider's Web' attacks on Russia's old military planes, NATO has inadvertently improved the long term viability of Russian advancement, particularly in terms of air attacks.
Reckless indeed.
So, don't attack them as a means of defending your nation in case you upset them and they...they...attack you more?
Russia has already shown it's incredibly weaker than they pretended. The amount of red lines they keep drawing are so far in the distance behind us we can't see the beginning anymore.
The russian pilots can be happy for the next twenty years while they wait for their new plane to get made
Good point. Agree with you there. It's a little bit like Israel's 'Operation Days of Repentance' attacks on Iranian military installations in October. A 'caveman' approach to showing them how you can conduct precision attacks on certain military sites with disruption being the main goal but probably not something that can win you an actual war.The point of attacking them, besides showing Russia they could hit them anywhere, was to show that yes indeed, they do have cards to play.
I doubt anyone would believe that Ukrainian military forces could pull off such an operation on their own. Therefore some NATO involvement must have been in place.So they should have done nothing?
I understand you shouldn't poke the bear but what's Ukraine to do? Sit there and just keep getting bombed or go on the front foot and try and take the initiative and force the issue.
Also you say MI6 is involved. Why? What makes this something the MI6 would do? Any source for that? You seem rather confident. I'm not saying they weren't but a statement like that needs some of corroborating evidence.
12-18 months more likely.
I doubt anyone would believe that Ukrainian military forces could pull off such an operation on their own. Therefore some NATO involvement must have been in place.
I doubt anyone would believe that Ukrainian military forces could pull off such an operation on their own. Therefore some NATO involvement must have been in place.
As for collaboration only France and Britain have these kinds of capabilities in European NATO and I don't think MI6 or the French DRM, if it was them have released any press statements confirming their involvement yet.....lol!
Connectivity/Technology is the major issue. The other factors they'd easily navigate ie border crossing, planning. But their technological expertise is incredible in its resourcefulness.What 'capabilities' did they need though? In base terms, they loaded trucks up with drones, drove them there and let them loose. Ukraine has probably developed and evolved drone warfare miles in front of anyone else in a conflict today.
Connectivity/Technology is the major issue. The other factors they'd easily navigate ie border crossing, planning. But their technological expertise is incredible in its resourcefulness.
Yeah I'm waiting to hear or read how they managed to operate those drones from such a distance. There's a bloke on the ABC that looks into this stuff and a couple of blokes on youtube that dig forensically into it. Bellingcat are a good go to for this sort of thing too.
ABC bloke here: