I answered the question. You just didn't like my answer. I cannot help that.That may be so but you still didn't answer the question. What do you think Trump meant by 'we don't need the votes'. He didn't say it once, he said it dozens of times.
By registering with us, you'll be able to discuss, share and private message with other members of our community.
Sign Up Now!I answered the question. You just didn't like my answer. I cannot help that.That may be so but you still didn't answer the question. What do you think Trump meant by 'we don't need the votes'. He didn't say it once, he said it dozens of times.
bless your poor little brainwashed mindAnd raped women. And walked into Miss World dressing rooms while the girls were undressed. And "grabbed them by the pussy" without consent. And did who knows what at Epstein's parties. And I suspect many other "ands".
I answered the question. You just didn't like my answer. I cannot help that.
Trump himself admitted to at least two of those things.bless your poor little brainwashed mind![]()
Here's another.
Why would I waste my time and effort reading your AI generated bullshit
Not really an answer though was it?
Why do you think he said it? It is an odd thing to say 'we don't need the votes' after saying for months 'I need everyone to get out there and vote', 'don't let them send you home' etc etc.
Here's Trump with full context.
no he didn'tTrump himself admitted to at least two of those things.
I said I don't know, because I haven't bothered to waste my time on it because I don't care.
Are you really following Aaron Rupar?Geez no wonder your mind is scrambled with misinformation. He's a Democrat Party troll/operative.
I've no idea who that bloke is. You just said there was no context. I gave you context.
This will be the longest thread on the forum.
This seems completely reasonable to me. I fully endorse this approach.
It's uncanny that in the good 'ole U.S. of A, they still have free speech in spite of the Democrats and Big Tech's best efforts - whereas in the state of Victoria in Oz, the Laborites are pushing new legislation for jail time up to 3 to 5 years for saying anything that is likely to be seen as a vilification.
Where, in Australia, are the major thought-leaders who can lead the people in a direction where getting their feelings hurt is part and parcel of a robust society whose progress hinges on the freedom to forge new ideas that will unavoidably butt heads with the status quo?
Once people are too scared to express ideas and reasons for fear it see them in jail for 3 to 5 years, the spark of the renaissance kindled a few hundred years ago will die out. It breeds an intellectually-fat people.
Benjamin Franklin famously stated,
“They who would give up an essential liberty for temporary security, deserve neither liberty nor security”.
he didn't say not to vote. Aaron Rupar said that. You don't believe your lying ears but believe Aaron Rupar.
This seems completely reasonable to me. I fully endorse this approach.
Benjamin Franklin also famously OWNED slaves so its is quite un-Christian to value his opinion on civil liberties.It's uncanny that in the good 'ole U.S. of A, they still have free speech in spite of the Democrats and Big Tech's best efforts - whereas in the state of Victoria in Oz, the Laborites are pushing new legislation for jail time up to 3 to 5 years for saying anything that is likely to be seen as a vilification.
Where, in Australia, are the major thought-leaders who can lead the people in a direction where getting their feelings hurt is part and parcel of a robust society whose progress hinges on the freedom to forge new ideas that will unavoidably butt heads with the status quo?
Once people are too scared to express ideas and reasons for fear it see them in jail for 3 to 5 years, the spark of the renaissance kindled a few hundred years ago will die out. It breeds an intellectually-fat people.
Benjamin Franklin famously stated,
“They who would give up an essential liberty for temporary security, deserve neither liberty nor security”.