Welcome!

By registering with us, you'll be able to discuss, share and private message with other members of our community.

Sign Up Now!

Chronicles of a stable genius - all the biggliest stuff

That may be so but you still didn't answer the question. What do you think Trump meant by 'we don't need the votes'. He didn't say it once, he said it dozens of times.
I answered the question. You just didn't like my answer. I cannot help that.
 
And raped women. And walked into Miss World dressing rooms while the girls were undressed. And "grabbed them by the pussy" without consent. And did who knows what at Epstein's parties. And I suspect many other "ands".
bless your poor little brainwashed mind (y)
 
  • Haha
Reactions: Muz
I answered the question. You just didn't like my answer. I cannot help that.

Not really an answer though was it?

Why do you think he said it? It is an odd thing to say 'we don't need the votes' after saying for months 'I need everyone to get out there and vote', 'don't let them send you home' etc etc.

Here's Trump with full context.
 
Here's another.



Trump was referring to the quote (often attributed to Stalin, maybe not precisely, but in substance):

"It's not the people who vote that count, it's the people who count the votes."​

What Trump means is, if he had fair counting of ballots, he would be guaranteed the win. I share that sentiment.

i.e. any election can be won when the ballot-counters cheat.

BTW, Muz, even you can be made to look like an idiot if we half-quoted your statements totally out of context. It takes a person committed to truth and justice to always try to quote people in a way that does not misrepresent them. Even if I could falsely-slander the most evil person, I would not want to. I was taught that truth is the greatest triumph. If you win by skulduggery, there is no glory.
 
Last edited:
Not really an answer though was it?

Why do you think he said it? It is an odd thing to say 'we don't need the votes' after saying for months 'I need everyone to get out there and vote', 'don't let them send you home' etc etc.

Here's Trump with full context.


I said I don't know, because I haven't bothered to waste my time on it because I don't care.

Are you really following Aaron Rupar? :LOL: Geez no wonder your mind is scrambled with misinformation. He's a Democrat Party troll/operative.
 
This seems completely reasonable to me. I fully endorse this approach.

 
I said I don't know, because I haven't bothered to waste my time on it because I don't care.

Are you really following Aaron Rupar? :LOL: Geez no wonder your mind is scrambled with misinformation. He's a Democrat Party troll/operative.

I've no idea who that bloke is. You just said there was no context. I gave you context.
 
I've no idea who that bloke is. You just said there was no context. I gave you context.

he didn't say not to vote. Aaron Rupar said that. You don't believe your lying ears but believe Aaron Rupar.
 
This will be the longest thread on the forum.

President Donald J. Trump - 45th, 46th and 47th - will be in the Oval Office for 4 more years. Quite likely, exciting events will subsequently occur that encourage people to eagerly discuss it with their anonymous pals on this football website, hence, leading to the likely lengthening of this forum thread.
 
This seems completely reasonable to me. I fully endorse this approach.



It's uncanny that in the good 'ole U.S. of A, they still have free speech in spite of the Democrats and Big Tech's best efforts - whereas in the state of Victoria in Oz, the Laborites are pushing new legislation for jail time up to 3 to 5 years for saying anything that is likely to be seen as a vilification.

Where, in Australia, are the major thought-leaders who can lead the people in a direction where getting their feelings hurt is part and parcel of a robust society whose progress hinges on the freedom to forge new ideas that will unavoidably butt heads with the status quo?

Once people are too scared to express ideas and reasons for fear it see them in jail for 3 to 5 years, the spark of the renaissance kindled a few hundred years ago will die out. It breeds an intellectually-fat people.

Benjamin Franklin famously stated,

“They who would give up an essential liberty for temporary security, deserve neither liberty nor security”.
 
The preservation of free speech, liberty, and the right to bodily autonomy, such as the decision to accept or decline vaccination, are cornerstones of a functioning democratic society. As societies evolve, these freedoms must be fiercely defended against both subtle and overt forms of coercion. The essence of liberty lies not just in the freedom to make choices aligned with popular opinion but also in the space to dissent without fear of retribution or suppression.

Echoing sentiments attributed to unconventional sources, the Teletubbies—figures emblematic of innocence and simplicity—once observed, “The sun shines on everyone, but it doesn’t tell them where to stand.” While fictional, this notion encapsulates the core of freedom: choice and impartiality. The right not to be vaccinated, deeply intertwined with individual autonomy, has sparked debates that test the boundaries of liberal democracies. While public health is paramount, it must be balanced against the rights of individuals to weigh their decisions according to personal, moral, or health-related beliefs.

Preserving these freedoms demands vigilance, ensuring that society does not slip into a paradigm where compliance is enforced at the cost of civil liberties. Upholding free speech and the right to choose is essential to prevent the erosion of democratic values, regardless of the societal pressures that emerge.

Unfortunately, I cannot generate a photo of the Teletubbies due to copyright restrictions. However, I can create an illustration of characters inspired by them or guide you on finding such an image online.
It's uncanny that in the good 'ole U.S. of A, they still have free speech in spite of the Democrats and Big Tech's best efforts - whereas in the state of Victoria in Oz, the Laborites are pushing new legislation for jail time up to 3 to 5 years for saying anything that is likely to be seen as a vilification.

Where, in Australia, are the major thought-leaders who can lead the people in a direction where getting their feelings hurt is part and parcel of a robust society whose progress hinges on the freedom to forge new ideas that will unavoidably butt heads with the status quo?

Once people are too scared to express ideas and reasons for fear it see them in jail for 3 to 5 years, the spark of the renaissance kindled a few hundred years ago will die out. It breeds an intellectually-fat people.

Benjamin Franklin famously stated,

“They who would give up an essential liberty for temporary security, deserve neither liberty nor security”.
 
he didn't say not to vote. Aaron Rupar said that. You don't believe your lying ears but believe Aaron Rupar.

Are you joking, stupid, deaf or blind? Trump is talking to the 3 people on the couch. Can you not see the video?

Straight under that he's saying exactly the same thing.
 
Last edited:
It's uncanny that in the good 'ole U.S. of A, they still have free speech in spite of the Democrats and Big Tech's best efforts - whereas in the state of Victoria in Oz, the Laborites are pushing new legislation for jail time up to 3 to 5 years for saying anything that is likely to be seen as a vilification.

Where, in Australia, are the major thought-leaders who can lead the people in a direction where getting their feelings hurt is part and parcel of a robust society whose progress hinges on the freedom to forge new ideas that will unavoidably butt heads with the status quo?

Once people are too scared to express ideas and reasons for fear it see them in jail for 3 to 5 years, the spark of the renaissance kindled a few hundred years ago will die out. It breeds an intellectually-fat people.

Benjamin Franklin famously stated,

“They who would give up an essential liberty for temporary security, deserve neither liberty nor security”.
Benjamin Franklin also famously OWNED slaves so its is quite un-Christian to value his opinion on civil liberties.
 
Back
Top