- Joined
- Oct 17, 2024
- Replies
- 5,280

- Thread Author
- #1
Looks like a weird hybrid of football and afl!
By registering with us, you'll be able to discuss, share and private message with other members of our community.
Sign Up Now!
Looks like a weird hybrid of football and afl!
Looks like a weird hybrid of football and afl!
specifically Gaelic Football, hence the ‘International Rules’ malarkey between the two codes.Yeah Aussie/Victorian/Melbourne Rules wasn't really invented, it was largely copied from already existing rules of various codes. But let them believe it's special or indigenous.
Not as weird as Calcio Storico
Yeah those two games are interesting debates themselves. I've seen some Gaelic football experts claim that they copied the Melbourne rules almost word for word. And I agree with you there about Marngrook, all the old articles I've read from the 1800s suggest they were closer to Cambridge or Sheffield rules rather than Melbourne. Having said that, most of the Melbourne rules were from soccer, as was gridiron. Rugby similar.specifically Gaelic Football, hence the ‘International Rules’ malarkey between the two codes.
And the fact remains that most ball-games played by First Nations Australians prior to&after European colonisation would’ve more closely resembled️ than any variation of
..
Yeah those two games are interesting debates themselves. I've seen some Gaelic football experts claim that they copied the Melbourne rules almost word for word. And I agree with you there about Marngrook, all the old articles I've read from the 1800s suggest they were closer to Cambridge or Sheffield rules rather than Melbourne. Having said that, most of the Melbourne rules were from soccer, as was gridiron. Rugby similar.
Is soccer we still say "it's gone behind for a corner/goal kick". It was the same in Aussie rules, and they played on rectangles with round balls. They used to have the same scoring, 1 point for a goal and nothing for "behind". My memory might be hazey on this part, but I think they then started awarding 1 point for every six behinds, this then got changed to six points for a goal and one point for a behind.
Funny thing in gridiron, it was the same rules and scoring as soccer. Then they brought in tries for one point, but goals were worth four! Today that's flipped, touchdowns are worth more than the goals.
Yep. Growing up with AFL in the 90s, they were pushing the link heavily back then. Since the internet and newspaper archives have come online, they gone very quiet about it.Even the AFL's official history doesn't link Marngrook with Australian Rules.
Just some fantasy some clown invented to try and justify the 'relevance' to Australians as it's 'national game'.