Welcome!

By registering with us, you'll be able to discuss, share and private message with other members of our community.

Sign Up Now!

Chronicles of a stable genius - all the biggliest stuff

JS - Wasn't Mueller a Trump appointee?

And Trump's own campaign chair was found guilty of colluding with the Russians. And also Flynn his national security adviser ffs.

That is no spin, the right try and say 'Russia Hoax' as if to dismiss like pwoor widdle wussia never did anything, nor did anyone in trumps orbit - but they did.

I am more than happy to say he is not guilty of colluding with Russia, sure he might've used it to his advantage but he was not guilty of that crime.
 
T_S_F said:
JS - Wasn't Mueller a Trump appointee?

And Trump's own campaign chair was found guilty of colluding with the Russians. And also Flynn his national security adviser ffs.

That is no spin, the right try and say 'Russia Hoax' as if to dismiss like pwoor widdle wussia never did anything, nor did anyone in trumps orbit - but they did.

I am more than happy to say he is not guilty of colluding with Russia, sure he might've used it to his advantage but he was not guilty of that crime.
Click to expand...

Not accurate.

"Jeff Sessions [- Trump's attorney General - felt] compelled to recuse himself from the Russia investigation due to his prior involvement in Donald Trump's 2016 presidential campaign, which created a conflict of interest."​
​
"Robert Mueller was appointed as special counsel by Deputy Attorney General Rod Rosenstein on May 17, 2017, to oversee the investigation into Russian interference in the 2016 U.S. presidential election and related matters."​

Rod Rosenstein was an anti-Trump bureaucrat. The entire team of the Muller investigation was crammed with Trump-hating Democrat lawyers.

Andrew Weissmann was the lead prosecutor in the Muller team. Weissmann is a rabid Trump-hater.
 
T_S_F said:
JS - Wasn't Mueller a Trump appointee?

And Trump's own campaign chair was found guilty of colluding with the Russians. And also Flynn his national security adviser ffs.

That is no spin, the right try and say 'Russia Hoax' as if to dismiss like pwoor widdle wussia never did anything, nor did anyone in trumps orbit - but they did.

I am more than happy to say he is not guilty of colluding with Russia, sure he might've used it to his advantage but he was not guilty of that crime.
Click to expand...

Your post proves how effective law-fare is. The Leftist bring deranged court cases against conservatives - and threaten to destroy them financially -- they cave in by accepting plea bargains -- and people like tsf say, "See, they were guilty".

"In December 2016, General Michael Flynn pleaded guilty to lying to FBI agents about his contacts with Russian officials, specifically regarding conversations with Russian Ambassador Sergey Kislyak during the transition period after the 2016 election. This plea was part of a deal that allowed him to cooperate with the investigation into Russian interference in the election. However, after pleading guilty, Flynn sought to withdraw his plea in 2020, claiming that he had been coerced into the agreement and that the FBI had acted improperly during its investigation."​
 
Dirty politics. They release the accusations against Gaetz in "draft form" - which means, the draft can include all manner of un-true slander, and then that draft gets leaked or spread to influence the attacks on Gaetz. And the final version has those parts removed, and they can claim it was only a draft.

And that works. The people like you believe it.

www.newsweek.com

Matt Gaetz ethics report released to more members of Congress

Donald Trump has chosen Gaetz for his attorney general, but a House ethics panel's probe looms over the nomination.
www.newsweek.com www.newsweek.com
 
johnsmith said:
"In December 2016, General Michael Flynn pleaded guilty to lying to FBI agents about his contacts with Russian officials, specifically regarding conversations with Russian Ambassador Sergey Kislyak during the transition period after the 2016 election. This plea was part of a deal that allowed him to cooperate with the investigation into Russian interference in the election. However, after pleading guilty, Flynn sought to withdraw his plea in 2020, claiming that he had been coerced into the agreement and that the FBI had acted improperly during its investigation."​
Click to expand...

hahahah this is a former general coming up with this lame excuse. FMD....pwoor widdle general...this is not some housewife in Alaska ffs

So even when they plead guilty, they're innocent. Deluded.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Muz
johnsmith said:
Dirty politics. They release the accusations against Gaetz in "draft form" - which means, the draft can include all manner of un-true slander, and then that draft gets leaked or spread to influence the attacks on Gaetz. And the final version has those parts removed, and they can claim it was only a draft.

And that works. The people like you believe it.

www.newsweek.com

Matt Gaetz ethics report released to more members of Congress

Donald Trump has chosen Gaetz for his attorney general, but a House ethics panel's probe looms over the nomination.
www.newsweek.com www.newsweek.com
Click to expand...
I haven't read it. Nor know of his guilt or innocence.

But I do find it weird you go in to bat for this guy
 
T_S_F said:
hahahah this is a former general coming up with this lame excuse. FMD....pwoor widdle general...this is not some housewife in Alaska ffs

So even when they plead guilty, they're innocent. Deluded.
Click to expand...


I don't know if you're old enough to remember the 1960's 70's and 80's when most South America countries were under military dictatorships. The professions that were targeted for prison and persecution were lawyers and journalists.

Now for the last 4 years in the United States, we've seen lawyers, who represented Trump, being sued for merely defending their clients. In Georgia, there was a RICO case accusing Trump's lawyers of being in a conspiracy, merely for defending Trump.

But this law-fare does work because it persuades the simple-minded folk, who make up about 95% of any society, who think in this simple logic: the lawyer took the plea deal, so they must have been guilty.

If you're threatened with jail time, and loss of all your financial assets - in exchange for a plea deal to plead guilty - which would you take. Very few people stand up for truth. Most of his lawyers caved under that pressure, e.g. Sidney Powell, Jenna Ellis.

Rudi Giuliani did not cave in, and he lost his law practice licence, and $148 million awarded against him. That amount is intended to destroy anyone who sides with Trump.
 
johnsmith said:
This is why, for me, facts and evidence are all-important. And it's what leads me even to the 6,000 year issue (as Muz will be quick to remind) ... facts and evidence.

The 6,000 year issue is proof that people like Muz operate -- not on facts/evidence -- but on an automatic-assumption mode.
Click to expand...

How are your peer reviewed papers about the 6000 year old earth coming along? Found any you can cite yet?

Probably with the evidence for 'sportsman dropping like flies'.

Clown.
 
Last edited:
Muz said:
How are your peer reviewed papers about the 6000 year old earth coming sitting? Found any you can cite yet?

Probably with the evidence for 'sportsman dropping like flies'.

Clown.
Click to expand...

My rationale:

  1. We live in a society characterised by cancel-culture.

  2. Cancel culture permeates academia.

  3. Cancel-culture and law-fare (the use of the legal system to destroy opponents) are very effective in persuading the idiot-category in society.

For instance, if a certain field is dominated by people who hold one viewpoint -- and they use cancel-culture to block publication of papers from the other side of the opinion -- the idiot-category of people will say, "Oh, there's no peer reviewed papers saying that, so it cannot be true".

The following papers are about corruption in academic publishing -- but Muz will say there is no such thing:

The Effects of Corrupted Peer Reviews on Scientific Credibility - Enago Academy

Peer review loses its importance when publishing more papers becomes more important than publishing better papers.
www.enago.com www.enago.com

wenr.wes.org

Understanding the Causes and Social Costs of Academic Corruption

What global and local macro-trends contribute to corruption in academia? How are individuals, higher education institutions, and civil society affected?
wenr.wes.org wenr.wes.org

Corruption in the health sector: A problem in need of a systems-thinking approach - PMC

Health systems are comprised of complex interactions between multiple different actors with differential knowledge and understanding of the subject and system. It is exactly this complexity that makes it particularly vulnerable to corruption, which ...
pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov


link.springer.com

Corruption, the Lack of Academic Integrity and Other Ethical Issues in Higher Education: What Can Be Done Within the Bologna Process?

Transparency International (TI), an NGO working on corruption worldwide, commonly defines corruption as “the abuse of entrusted power for private gain.” In higher education, however, corruption also encompasses “the lack of academic...
link.springer.com link.springer.com

www.u4.no

Overview of corruption in academic research

Corruption in academic research has consequences beyond the academic community. When it happens in medical research or in research upon which policy decisions will be based, it can have devastating effects for the whole community. However, even when the research itself might not have an impact...
www.u4.no
 
johnsmith said:
My rationale:

  1. We live in a society characterised by cancel-culture.

  2. Cancel culture permeates academia.

  3. Cancel-culture and law-fare (the use of the legal system to destroy opponents) are very effective in persuading the idiot-category in society.

For instance, if a certain field is dominated by people who hold one viewpoint -- and they use cancel-culture to block publication of papers from the other side of the opinion -- the idiot-category of people will say, "Oh, there's no peer reviewed papers saying that, so it cannot be true".

The following papers are about corruption in academic publishing -- but Muz will say there is no such thing:

The Effects of Corrupted Peer Reviews on Scientific Credibility - Enago Academy

Peer review loses its importance when publishing more papers becomes more important than publishing better papers.
www.enago.com www.enago.com

wenr.wes.org

Understanding the Causes and Social Costs of Academic Corruption

What global and local macro-trends contribute to corruption in academia? How are individuals, higher education institutions, and civil society affected?
wenr.wes.org wenr.wes.org

Corruption in the health sector: A problem in need of a systems-thinking approach - PMC

Health systems are comprised of complex interactions between multiple different actors with differential knowledge and understanding of the subject and system. It is exactly this complexity that makes it particularly vulnerable to corruption, which ...
pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov


link.springer.com

Corruption, the Lack of Academic Integrity and Other Ethical Issues in Higher Education: What Can Be Done Within the Bologna Process?

Transparency International (TI), an NGO working on corruption worldwide, commonly defines corruption as “the abuse of entrusted power for private gain.” In higher education, however, corruption also encompasses “the lack of academic...
link.springer.com link.springer.com

www.u4.no

Overview of corruption in academic research

Corruption in academic research has consequences beyond the academic community. When it happens in medical research or in research upon which policy decisions will be based, it can have devastating effects for the whole community. However, even when the research itself might not have an impact...
www.u4.no
Click to expand...

So none?
 
johnsmith said:
Rudi Giuliani did not cave in, and he lost his law practice licence, and $148 million awarded against him. That amount is intended to destroy anyone who sides with Trump.
Click to expand...

Or just maybe. Just maybe...he spread utter bullshit that was destroying people's lives.

Also you act like there is some secret force Trump is up against, He was just elected the leader of the country, Why would they let that happen if they have such great amazing powers? Do you think there is a conspiracy in absolutely everything...
 
T_S_F said:
Or just maybe. Just maybe...he spread utter bullshit that was destroying people's lives.

Also you act like there is some secret force Trump is up against, He was just elected the leader of the country, Why would they let that happen if they have such great amazing powers? Do you think there is a conspiracy in absolutely everything...
Click to expand...

Because, in order for the Democrats to cheat, it's not as simple as dumping fake ballots into the box.

No. The cheating requires that each fake-ballot be correlated to a name on the voter-roll that is invalid, e.g. a person who moved out of the State, a dead person, a fake-entry in the voter roll.

i.e. there's a finite number of fake ballots that the cheaters can bring in. The number of Trump votes was so great, the Democrats could not cheat enough without being too overt.

Another reason for the Democrats not succeeding is that the Republicans were more on guard in 2024 against the Democrats trying the same tricks. See the following article about a Republican win in court against them trying to count fake-ballots, i.e. no dates, false dates, false signatures etc.

Think. 67 counties in Pennsylvania being ordered to stop going against the court's order for illegally counting undated or misdated ballots. Fake ballots will typically have fake-dates or no dates, or fake signatures.

https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2024/11/huge-win-pa-supreme-court-orders-all-county/
 
T_S_F said:
Also you act like there is some secret force Trump is up against,
Click to expand...

If I only read Mainstream Media, and believed it 100% -- and I know many good, genuine people who are like that --- I'd probably say the same thing as you.
 
johnsmith said:
If I only read Mainstream Media, and believed it 100% -- and I know many good, genuine people who are like that --- I'd probably say the same thing as you.
Click to expand...
I am not going to argue with you here.

Yes, reading bullshit like the gatewaypundit will warp your mind. I agree
 
T_S_F said:
I am not going to argue with you here.

Yes, reading bullshit like the gatewaypundit will warp your mind. I agree
Click to expand...

@tsf

How's the logic.

Matt Gaetz is not guilty because a court of law hasn't found him so. (Fair enough.)

Trump, convicted of 34 felony counts, is innocent because of a 'weaponised justice system' and/or (this is a new one to me) 'law-fare'.

Uh huh. So is there any way any of these people can be guilty of anything?

Or

'Peer review is the gold standard'.

'Unless it disagrees with me'.
 
  • Haha
Reactions: tsf
T_S_F said:
I am not going to argue with you here.

Yes, reading bullshit like the gatewaypundit will warp your mind. I agree
Click to expand...

Weird that only the democrats would bring in dead voters, voters who moved interstate etc etc. You'd think if it were a proper goer the GOP would have a crack at the same thing.

Just your weekly reminder all 60 of Trump's election fraud cases were thrown out. ALL SIXTY.
 
Muz said:
@tsf

How's the logic.

Matt Gaetz is not guilty because a court of law hasn't found him so. (Fair enough.)

Trump, convicted of 34 felony counts, is innocent because of a 'weaponised justice system' and/or (this is a new one to me) 'law-fare'.

Uh huh. So is there any way any of these people can be guilty of anything?

Or

'Peer review is the gold standard'.

'Unless it disagrees with me'.
Click to expand...

I can nearly empathise how the world must be a confusing place for someone like you.
Without the ability to reason and discern it would be one episode of cognitive dissonance after another. Such a state of despair results in an overdeveloped amygdala.
 
Muz said:
@tsf

How's the logic.

Matt Gaetz is not guilty because a court of law hasn't found him so. (Fair enough.)

Trump, convicted of 34 felony counts, is innocent because of a 'weaponised justice system' and/or (this is a new one to me) 'law-fare'.

Uh huh. So is there any way any of these people can be guilty of anything?

Or

'Peer review is the gold standard'.

'Unless it disagrees with me'.
Click to expand...
What's next? Alec Baldwin is guilty?
 
johnsmith said:
My rationale:

  1. We live in a society characterised by cancel-culture.

  2. Cancel culture permeates academia.

  3. Cancel-culture and law-fare (the use of the legal system to destroy opponents) are very effective in persuading the idiot-category in society.

For instance, if a certain field is dominated by people who hold one viewpoint -- and they use cancel-culture to block publication of papers from the other side of the opinion -- the idiot-category of people will say, "Oh, there's no peer reviewed papers saying that, so it cannot be true".

The following papers are about corruption in academic publishing -- but Muz will say there is no such thing:

The Effects of Corrupted Peer Reviews on Scientific Credibility - Enago Academy

Peer review loses its importance when publishing more papers becomes more important than publishing better papers.
www.enago.com www.enago.com

wenr.wes.org

Understanding the Causes and Social Costs of Academic Corruption

What global and local macro-trends contribute to corruption in academia? How are individuals, higher education institutions, and civil society affected?
wenr.wes.org wenr.wes.org

Corruption in the health sector: A problem in need of a systems-thinking approach - PMC

Health systems are comprised of complex interactions between multiple different actors with differential knowledge and understanding of the subject and system. It is exactly this complexity that makes it particularly vulnerable to corruption, which ...
pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov


link.springer.com

Corruption, the Lack of Academic Integrity and Other Ethical Issues in Higher Education: What Can Be Done Within the Bologna Process?

Transparency International (TI), an NGO working on corruption worldwide, commonly defines corruption as “the abuse of entrusted power for private gain.” In higher education, however, corruption also encompasses “the lack of academic...
link.springer.com link.springer.com

www.u4.no

Overview of corruption in academic research

Corruption in academic research has consequences beyond the academic community. When it happens in medical research or in research upon which policy decisions will be based, it can have devastating effects for the whole community. However, even when the research itself might not have an impact...
www.u4.no
Click to expand...


Wait, what?

1731994174278.png
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top