Welcome!

By registering with us, you'll be able to discuss, share and private message with other members of our community.

Sign Up Now!

Chronicles of a stable genius - all the biggliest stuff

"Anna Paulina Luna to lead task force on declassification of JFK assassination records, Epstein client list"

https://www.foxnews.com/politics/re...classification-jfk-assassination-records-more

For the JFK and Epstein names, do we start a new thread or keep it in the biggliest thread?

This is Rep. Anna Paulina Luna

say-hello-to-the-hottest-member-in-congress-rep-anna-v0-AoJzcfUB4VMqiAT3EQkjmEPZInqR1LUUKI2tU6YB8Sc.jpg
 
task force on declassification of JFK assassination records, Epstein client list"

hah ah fmd, you know trump could've just released all this on day dot if he wanted. So either:

a- he doesn't want to, but knows if he strings along the fucking idiots it will work better for him
b - he's weak and holds no real power because the country is controlled by a cabal of reptilian pedophiles, and he is trying hard to fight them for all of us.
 
hah ah fmd, you know trump could've just released all this on day dot if he wanted. So either:

a- he doesn't want to, but knows if he strings along the fucking idiots it will work better for him
b - he's weak and holds no real power because the country is controlled by a cabal of reptilian pedophiles, and he is trying hard to fight them for all of us.

Lol. If you google 'Trump Epstein' about a thousand photos come up of the mango and Epstein as well as convicted sex trafficker Maxwell.

Not surprisingly there have been delays.

As for the Kennedy thing. The release will show nothing new and will show Oswald was the lone killer. As is true.

Of course the tin foil hat wearers will then say 'not all the files were released'.

Guaranteed.

GVTSNCMWoAAXWaF.jpg
 
As for the Kennedy thing. The release will show nothing new and will show Oswald was the lone killer. As is true.

Of course the tin foil hat wearers will then say 'not all the files were released'.

Guaranteed.


yeah, all these turnips staking their entire existence on this revealing some kind of world changing info....

What will the Epstein thing show anyway? that the elite (probably including Don) had sex parties at Epstein's and he probably used that as leverage to get investors and be in the inner circle. Yeah, that's obvious.

As for Kennedy, whatever is released will not be believed unless it says 'Kennedy was killed by androchrome drinking reptillian paedos who secretly control the world, because he was about to blow the lid on them. And we can't have that'
 
https://www.news.com.au/world/north...e/news-story/9836eb9ce2e0d8f11afe4165a8d6c933
"Elon Musk’s latest White House video reveals Trump 2.0’s ‘bro-pocalypse’"

This attack-article against Trump and Elon Musk by the Australian writer, in the Melbourne Age - I don't know how the reader comments being wholly anti-Trump reflect the reality in Australia. Melbourne is a Leftist stronghold, and The AGE is a Leftist propaganda outlet. And I know that over the recent decades, virtually none of my reader comments submitted to The AGE are ever published, which means that The AGE censors conservative/Right-leaning comments.

If we step back and see this from the biggest picture, the majority of people on this forum are not just Centre-Left, and actually Far-Far Left, Australia being Far more Left than it chooses to acknowledge.

My rationale:

- a Centre-Left person who acknowledge their difference with @johnsmith's Centre-Right opinions

- but a Far-Far-Left person would regard @johnsmith's Centre-Right comments as being idiotic and crazy. That would demonstrate how far Left the person is.
This is your best one yet johnnie boy.

So political ideology is now determined by what reaction people have to your ramblings on a football forum ..... wow.... just wow.
 
If anyone actually cares enough there's a 7 part podcast of the Kennedy assassination from The Rest Is History lads. They step out every conspiracy and systematically dismantle each and every one.

Then they look at Oswald and show beyond doubt he was the lone killer.

Which is of course what the Warren report showed.

Episode 1 here. Highly recommend.

 
  • Like
Reactions: tsf
If anyone actually cares enough there's a 7 part podcast of the Kennedy assassination from The Rest Is History lads. They step out every conspiracy and systematically dismantle each and every one.

Then they look at Oswald and show beyond doubt he was the lone killer.

Which is of course what the Warren report showed.

Episode 1 here. Highly recommend.

I dont think it in much dispute (anymore) as to Oswald being the only shooter - although the skill it took to accomplish what he did is questioned by some gun toting nuts ove there... The reason he did the shooting is what I would like to know.... And why Ruby shot him before we could find out....
 
I dont think it in much dispute (anymore) as to Oswald being the only shooter - although the skill it took to accomplish what he did is questioned by some gun toting nuts ove there... The reason he did the shooting is what I would like to know.... And why Ruby shot him before we could find out....

All covered in the podcast. The shooting skill is overstated. Kennedy was travelling in a straight line from Oswald's position and travelling slowly.

One of the TV stations in the 60s went out to a range and set up a dummy on a trolley and replicated the car speed and sightlines from the shooter's position. Something like 8 or 9 out of the 10 blokes with the same level of marksmanship as Oswald hit the dummy multiple times. I'll see if I can find it.

Of all the conspiracies there are I thought this one had the most legs until I listened to the podcast.

I realise it's a big commitment to listen but the 2 blokes hosting it are very good hosts. Give them a listen.
 
All covered in the podcast. The shooting skill is overstated. Kennedy was travelling in a straight line from Oswald's position and travelling slowly.

One of the TV stations in the 60s went out to a range and set up a dummy on a trolley and replicated the car speed and sightlines from the shooter's position. Something like 8 or 9 out of the 10 blokes with the same level of marksmanship as Oswald hit the dummy multiple times. I'll see if I can find it.

Of all the conspiracies there are I thought this one had the most legs until I listened to the podcast.

I realise it's a big commitment to listen but the 2 blokes hosting it are very good hosts. Give them a listen.
OH, OK, Ill try if I get a moment... Years ago I had watched a similar thing, I guess with an opposite conclusion, some Marine Sniper school dude basically set up the same shot and had 4-5 of the sniper schools best students, using modern scopes and equipment, try the same shout and fail 9/10 ....??? Dont know anywhere near enough to argue one way or another....
 
  • Like
Reactions: Muz
OH, OK, Ill try if I get a moment... Years ago I had watched a similar thing, I guess with an opposite conclusion, some Marine Sniper school dude basically set up the same shot and had 4-5 of the sniper schools best students, using modern scopes and equipment, try the same shout and fail 9/10 ....??? Dont know anywhere near enough to argue one way or another....

Found it. (Sort of.)



I got the details roughly correct. 11 shooters. They don't say how many of the 11 made successful hits. (I think I saw a longer clip, I'm still looking.)

All this bullshit about how it's impossible to shoot a bolt action under 6 seconds. The 3 blokes they show do it under 6 seconds and all three get at least 1 hit. One got 2 hits and one got 3.

Oswald only shot him twice and fired 3 times and had between 8 and 9 seconds. (As it was later calculated not the 6 initially stated.)

And the car slowed down considerably because the driver heard shots and braked instead of flooring it unlike what's shown here with constant movement.

First shot was from only 176 feet or approximately 50 metres. Fuck all.
 
Last edited:
Also.....

'Oswald, like all Marines at the time, received marksmanship instruction at 200, 300 and 500 yards with the standard-issue M1 rifle. All of those Marines were evaluated on the accuracy of 50 shots. Oswald qualified as a sharpshooter with a score of 212 at distances of 200, 300 and 500 yards.'

And....


Oswald’s Marine Marksmanship Ratings:

  1. 1956: He achieved a "Sharpshooter" rating, the second-highest of the three possible Marine Corps marksmanship levels:

    • Sharpshooter requires a score between 210 and 219 out of 250 on the M1 rifle qualification course.
    • This qualification means he demonstrated the ability to hit targets from 200, 300, and 500 yards with varying accuracy.

  1. 1959: Oswald later qualified with a "Marksman" rating, the lowest of the three ratings:


    • Marksman requires a score between 190 and 209 out of 250.
    • This indicates a drop in his shooting skills from his earlier score.
 
OH, OK, Ill try if I get a moment... Years ago I had watched a similar thing, I guess with an opposite conclusion, some Marine Sniper school dude basically set up the same shot and had 4-5 of the sniper schools best students, using modern scopes and equipment, try the same shout and fail 9/10 ....??? Dont know anywhere near enough to argue one way or another....

I put all my podcasts on in the car. Makes driving anywhere less painful.
 
Back
Top