Welcome!

By registering with us, you'll be able to discuss, share and private message with other members of our community.

Sign Up Now!

Chronicles of a stable genius - all the biggliest stuff

Hey cheers for your 100th post on this, I've decided to change who I vote for in the country I don't live in

The relevance is not because the U.S. election was across the other side of the world. It's because we, in Australia, are in a far worse position. Over there, conservatives were able to defend the onslaught because of a conservative Media, and also conservative social media. Those are largely absent in Australia. If you see the trend on this forum, and the previous website, you lot are mostly Lefties. This forum - aside from you thinking it is fun to insult and bash - is like a database of character studies of how average Aussies reason and think of life-changing decisions.
 
For those of you who think that, since the Republicans just won in 2024, it's silly to think that they were defrauded in 2020.

From being defrauded in 2020, now 4 years on, the Republicans were ready for the devious tactics the Democrats tried to repeat. Below are lists of the court battles that the Republicans won to circumvent the Dems cheating to the same degree as 4 years ago:


 
The relevance is not because the U.S. election was across the other side of the world. It's because we, in Australia, are in a far worse position. Over there, conservatives were able to defend the onslaught because of a conservative Media, and also conservative social media. Those are largely absent in Australia. If you see the trend on this forum, and the previous website, you lot are mostly Lefties. This forum - aside from you thinking it is fun to insult and bash - is like a database of character studies of how average Aussies reason and think of life-changing decisions.
Cheers, I hate windmills now. See shit so clear now. Anything else?
 
The relevance is not because the U.S. election was across the other side of the world. It's because we, in Australia, are in a far worse position. Over there, conservatives were able to defend the onslaught because of a conservative Media, and also conservative social media. Those are largely absent in Australia. If you see the trend on this forum, and the previous website, you lot are mostly Lefties. This forum - aside from you thinking it is fun to insult and bash - is like a database of character studies of how average Aussies reason and think of life-changing decisions.

WTF are you on about? All the largest media organisations in Australia are conservative - radio, newspaper and TV lol
 
  • Like
Reactions: Muz
WTF are you on about? All the largest media organisations in Australia are conservative - radio, newspaper and TV lol

I asked AI: Is the Melbourne THE AGE newspaper in 2024 Right or Left? The AGE was definitely RIGHT many decades ago - when did the Leftward drift occur and how did it occur?

Based on the search results, The Age newspaper in Melbourne has undergone a significant shift from its conservative roots to a more left-leaning position over the decades. Here's a summary of its political evolution:

## Historical Right-Wing Stance

The Age was indeed a conservative newspaper in its early years. It supported liberal politicians and policies in the late 19th and early 20th centuries, including protectionism and the White Australia policy[2].

## Leftward Shift

The major leftward drift of The Age occurred in the 1960s and 1970s. Several key events and changes contributed to this shift:

1. **New Leadership**: In 1964, Ranald Macdonald became the managing director at age 26[2].

2. **Editorial Change**: In 1966, Graham Perkin was appointed as editor at age 36[2].

3. **Editorial Independence**: In 1966, the Syme family shareholders partnered with Fairfax, creating a 50/50 voting partnership that guaranteed editorial independence[2].

4. **Shift in Editorial Line**: Under Macdonald and Perkin's leadership, the paper's editorial line shifted from conservative liberalism to a new "left liberalism"[2].

5. **Focus on Progressive Issues**: The Age began paying more attention to issues such as race, gender, disability rights, and the environment[2].

6. **Political Alignment**: The paper became more supportive of the Australian Labor Party after years of usually supporting the Coalition[2].

## Current Political Stance

As of 2024, The Age is considered to have a left-center bias:

1. **Left-Center Bias**: Media Bias/Fact Check rates The Age as having a "Left-Center" bias based on story selection and editorial positions that usually favor the left[1].

2. **High Factual Reporting**: Despite its left-leaning bias, The Age is rated high for factual reporting due to proper sourcing and a clean fact-check record[1].

3. **Editorial Views**: The Age holds left-leaning editorial views while reporting news factually[1].

In conclusion, while The Age was indeed right-leaning many decades ago, its significant leftward shift occurred primarily in the 1960s and 1970s due to changes in leadership and editorial direction. This shift has persisted, with the paper maintaining a left-center bias in its current reporting and editorial stance.

Citations:
[1] https://mediabiasfactcheck.com/the-age-australia/
[2] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Age





I asked AI: Is that the same for the Sydney Morning Herald

Based on the search results provided, it appears that the Sydney Morning Herald (SMH) has undergone a similar leftward shift as The Age, though perhaps not to the same extent. Here's a summary of the SMH's current political stance and evolution:

## Current Political Stance

The Sydney Morning Herald is generally considered to have a left-center bias:

1. Media Bias/Fact Check rates SMH as "Left-Center Biased" based on editorial positions that slightly favor the left[2].

2. Biasly.com gives SMH a bias score of -12% (Somewhat Liberal)[3].

3. The SMH is described as having high factual reporting despite its left-leaning bias[2].

## Historical Evolution

The SMH's political leanings have shifted over time:

1. Historically, the SMH was considered more centrist or even conservative[4][5].

2. Over the past few decades, particularly in the last 30 years, the paper has become more liberal in its stance[5].

3. The shift seems to have accelerated in the 1990s when the editorial line started to be determined more by editors and senior journalists rather than ownership[5].

## Factors Influencing the Shift

Several factors have contributed to the SMH's leftward drift:

1. Changes in ownership, including the recent acquisition by Nine Entertainment[4].

2. Evolving editorial leadership and journalistic staff[5].

3. Adapting to changing societal views and the political climate of Sydney and Australia[5].

## Current Perception

The SMH's current political stance is subject to debate:

1. Some readers perceive it as center-right with some left-leaning articles[4].

2. Others describe it as a mix of "inner city leftie" issues with right-wing editorials[4].

3. The paper is seen as representing "left-leaning conservatives" by some observers[4].

It's worth noting that while the SMH has moved leftward, it may not have shifted as far left as The Age. The SMH is still described by some as "center-right" or a mix of left and right perspectives, whereas The Age is more consistently characterized as left-leaning. Both papers, however, are generally regarded as factual in their reporting despite their editorial biases.

Citations:
[1] https://www.aph.gov.au/DocumentStore.ashx?id=98f0f684-d8a1-4022-9d62-df6e4feba233&subId=713904
[2] https://mediabiasfactcheck.com/the-sydney-morning-herald/
[3] https://www.biasly.com/sources/the-sydney-morning-herald-bias-rating/
[4]
[5] https://www.abc.net.au/news/2021-04-20/the-sydney-morning-herald-turns-190/100080944
[6] https://mediabiasfactcheck.com/the-age-australia/
[7] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Age
[8] https://www.britannica.com/topic/The-Sydney-Morning-Herald
 
so outside of Sky News...which ones were not anti-Trump?

That's the point. In Australia, aside from some like The Australian which are behind a paywall, there is hardly an viable conservative voice to withstand the onslaught of the leftward march of the Media, academia (universities) and entertainment.

Consequently, Australians are far more left than in America, because Aussies don't usually get to hear both sides of the story.

In the U.S., perhaps the conservative/lefty split could be about 50/50, whereas in Australia my guess is 30/70 or more.
 
That's the point. In Australia, aside from some like The Australian which are behind a paywall, there is hardly an viable conservative voice to withstand the onslaught of the leftward march of the Media, academia (universities) and entertainment.

Consequently, Australians are far more left than in America, because Aussies don't usually get to hear both sides of the story.

In the U.S., perhaps the conservative/lefty split could be about 50/50, whereas in Australia my guess is 30/70 or more.

If you have such an extremist right view as this clown, even those who are moderately right of centre are considered to be radical lefties.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Muz
If you have such an extremist right view as this clown, even those who are moderately right of centre are considered to be radical lefties.

That is an accurate comment in the sense that, because Australia has gone so far left to be now "far left" (as defined a few years ago), it means that sane conservatives are now branded "far right".

For instance, a few decades ago, the things I write would be regarded as centre right.

But, as Elon Musk used this diagram to explain it:
 

Attachments

  • SCR-20241110-ohtm.png
    SCR-20241110-ohtm.png
    357.7 KB · Views: 1
That is an accurate comment in the sense that, because Australia has gone so far left to be now "far left" (as defined a few years ago), it means that sane conservatives are now branded "far right".

For instance, a few decades ago, the things I write would be regarded as centre right.

But, as Elon Musk used this diagram to explain it:

I’m not going to write an esssy refuting this, it is only your brainwashed opinion presented without any evidence (sound familiar?).

What I will say though is that you are full of shit, and the empirical evidence available supports that.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Muz
Perhaps pro-commonsense is not the same as anti-Trump.

If the media reported accurately and it made trump look like a lying, insane, religious zealot with a massive narcissist then I would argue it is not anti-trump bias but is simply reporting.
 
Perhaps pro-commonsense is not the same as anti-Trump.

If the media reported accurately and it made trump look like a lying, insane, religious zealot with a massive narcissist then I would argue it is not anti-trump bias but is simply reporting.

weird take and only confirms the original allegation made about the Australian legacy media's bias and leanings
 
Perhaps pro-commonsense is not the same as anti-Trump.

If the media reported accurately and it made trump look like a lying, insane, religious zealot with a massive narcissist then I would argue it is not anti-trump bias but is simply reporting.
But i want to say left and right and left and right because it makes me look smart. Also line dancing, but mostly smart.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Muz
considering you said The Australian, that would also put Daily Telegaph, Courier Mail, Herald Sun, et al in that category as well.

The point I made was much of the conservative Mainstream Media is behind a paywall - much of SkyNews, The Australian, Daily Telegraph, Courier Mail, Herald Sun.

If you see the corresponding situation in the U.S., while the main Media is Left, there are a substantial voice to enunciate the message of the Right. Not so in Australia.

The average person in the street in Australia -- from my personal conversations -- just parrot the news that they don't like Trump because of the way he insults people. This means, they have had no input as to the other side of the story. Most people in Australia, faced by the Leftist Media that portrays him as a misogynist, white supremacist, facist, Nazi etc -- they have no Mainstream input for the other side.

Thus, in the U.S. population you have 50% who vote for him. But in Australia, from my conversations, it's virtually 80% that assume the Leftist Media is the full story.

In my writings on these forums, I have appealed to the current generation of Australians to see the other side of the story. But my conclusion, that I've drawn from my interactions with you mob, is that the generation of 2024 is not the fair-minded people compared to, say, the 1970's and 1980's. The heart and soul of Australia has changed over the course of a generation.
 
The point I made was much of the conservative Mainstream Media is behind a paywall - much of SkyNews, The Australian, Daily Telegraph, Courier Mail, Herald Sun.

If you see the corresponding situation in the U.S., while the main Media is Left, there are a substantial voice to enunciate the message of the Right. Not so in Australia.

The average person in the street in Australia -- from my personal conversations -- just parrot the news that they don't like Trump because of the way he insults people. This means, they have had no input as to the other side of the story. Most people in Australia, faced by the Leftist Media that portrays him as a misogynist, white supremacist, facist, Nazi etc -- they have no Mainstream input for the other side.

Thus, in the U.S. population you have 50% who vote for him. But in Australia, from my conversations, it's virtually 80% that assume the Leftist Media is the full story.

In my writings on these forums, I have appealed to the current generation of Australians to see the other side of the story. But my conclusion, that I've drawn from my interactions with you mob, is that the generation of 2024 is not the fair-minded people compared to, say, the 1970's and 1980's. The heart and soul of Australia has changed over the course of a generation.
Just a shame what happened to Australia, time for you to jog on
 
The point I made was much of the conservative Mainstream Media is behind a paywall - much of SkyNews, The Australian, Daily Telegraph, Courier Mail, Herald Sun.

If you see the corresponding situation in the U.S., while the main Media is Left, there are a substantial voice to enunciate the message of the Right. Not so in Australia.

The average person in the street in Australia -- from my personal conversations -- just parrot the news that they don't like Trump because of the way he insults people. This means, they have had no input as to the other side of the story. Most people in Australia, faced by the Leftist Media that portrays him as a misogynist, white supremacist, facist, Nazi etc -- they have no Mainstream input for the other side.

Thus, in the U.S. population you have 50% who vote for him. But in Australia, from my conversations, it's virtually 80% that assume the Leftist Media is the full story.

In my writings on these forums, I have appealed to the current generation of Australians to see the other side of the story. But my conclusion, that I've drawn from my interactions with you mob, is that the generation of 2024 is not the fair-minded people compared to, say, the 1970's and 1980's. The heart and soul of Australia has changed over the course of a generation.
I find it impossible to believe that you have personal conversations with the average person in the streets. I strongly suspect that if you tried to converse with an everyday person in the street, that person would quickly remove themselves from the conversation, or tell you to fuck off and then remove themselves from the conversation.
 
Back
Top