Thats actually a lot more balanced an answer than I thought your were willing or capable of giving johnny boy... Its not entirely answering my question, well not in the way I meant to put it anyway... but the most honest response from you in a while and Ill acknowledge it with thanks.
My direct question was would you be happy if your son turned out "EXACTLY" like Donald Trump, not just the aspects of his personality you admire... the whole package...
For me, the fork in the road is whether there was credible evidence of election-fraud in the 2020 U.S. election, but this entirely paints two different pictures of Trump, depending whether there was, or was not, election fraud.
Scenario 1: there was no widespread election fraud .... hence, Trump is a Hitler-type anarchist who tried to overturn an election, Trump tramples on democracy, he is a tyrant who selects people who are merely loyalist who do Trump's bidding. etc. etc. as per the Leftist 50% of the U.S. media, and virtually 95% of the Australian media.
Scenario 2: there was very narrow, specific, localised fraud in the Democrat-controlled largest counties in about 6 swing states in the 2020 U.S. election.
BY COMMITTING fraud in just the largest Democrat-controlled city-counties of just 6 swing states, you swing the entire U.S. Electoral College. So it was the Media's lie that "there was no
WIDESPREAD fraud ---- it didn't need to be "widespread". The courts washed their hands of it, not wanting to be a single judge who overturns an entire national election, so they took the easy way out by refusing to admit the evidence for cross-examination, by using legal technicalities particularly "lack of standing". (I personally have professional experience in this, so it is a joke how people refuse to even look up the definition of "lack of standing" to gain insight. The bottom line is, when a case is thrown out for "lack of standing", it does not mean there was zero or lousy evidence ).
Consequently, the J6 protests were used by the Democrats and Democrat-controlled Media to tarr Trump as an insurrectionist. Trump was up against an entire system. Under this scenario 2, very few people in the world would have the internal strength of character to make a come-back. Even his lawyers - such as Rudi Giuliani, Sidney Powell and Jenna Ellis - they all crumbled under Democrat lawfare, threatening to destroy them, in exchange for many of them confessing to take plea-bargains.
According to this
Scenario 2, if I, myself, had a fraction of Donald Trump's strength of character, I would really benefit.
According to this
Scenario 2, have you seen the movie, Lincoln, directed by Stephen Spielberg starring Daniel Day Lewis as Abraham Lincoln. It gives a glimpse of the political barriers Lincoln had to overcome by the Democrat congress to pass his legislation to free the slaves. In that respect, Trump -- according to this Scenario 2 - faces even greater hurdles: the entire Media (controlled by his opponents) are against him, 50% of the society has gone woke, even greater percentage of around 70% of western countries (UK, AU, CA, EU etc) have gone woke. The entire world's media paints Trump as a monster.
If
Scenario 1 is true -- i.e. you lot on this forum are standing for truth -- then, as you say, Trump is a monster.
But if
Scenario 2 is true - then Donald J. Trump will go down in history as one of the greatest world leaders in history, and probably the last chance of turning around a western civilisation, before it declines into a new Dark Ages - as every civilisation in history has collapsed after its time in the sun.
In saying this, I recognise Donald Trump's many, many weaknesses. I do not regard Trump as a saviour. I would not be surprised if Trump, in the future, turned around to disappoint his political supporters. Because in my lifetime, virtually all politicians have disappointed me with unfulfilled promises. That includes Christian and non-Christian politicians. So I hope I'm not naive to think that any one human politician can be the Saviour of the world. No politician is worthy of our total trust.
For me, politics is always a choice between the lesser of two evils.
The next 4 years will see evidence come to light. Kash Patel in charge of the FBI, Tulsi Gabbard over the DNI, John Ratcliffe over the CIA, and Pam Bondi over the Department of Justice.
Scenario 1 - These people are either mindless-Trump loyalists (as portrayed by the Leftist Media), or
Scenario 2 - the absolute Dream Team to clean out U.S. government from top to bottom, as never before in its history.
