Hence it comes down to evidence.
When a court refuses to take on a case due to "lack of standing", it's a technicality where the court says you do not have the right to bring the case - which means the court doesn't even place the evidence under cross examination.
So when the Media and Democrats tell you there was no evidence -- they're lying to you, in a legal and literal sense.
Now that Pam Bondi and Kash Patel are set to be the heads of DoJ and FBI respectively, it's almost certain that there will be a chance for the evidence of 2020 election fraud to be tested. See the Senate Confirmation Hearing of Pam Bondi - the Democrats are fearful because the game is up, and their evils will be brought to light.
It's a fork in the road.
1) If there was insufficient evidence of 2020 election fraud , then Trump is said to be an insurrectionist -- and you
@Joparo are doing well to trust the Mainstream Media.
OR
2) If the subsequent evidence is given a proper hearing - and it turns out the Dems did cheat their way to the 2020 win - then Trump is the greatest president since George Washington, the J6 prisoners were the ultimate patriots who deserve the
Presidential Medal of Freedom, and you,
@Joparo are no different the masses who have made up the majority of every civilization since the dawn of time, being readily manipulated by lies, because your sense of safety is to follow the opinion of the crowd.
Two alternatives. The next 4 years will show you who you are in respect of how you, as a person, handle conflicting information. Do you test it by rigorous testing, or do you lump it as you having more important things to do in life, and generally just follow what the Media tells you.
