By registering with us, you'll be able to discuss, share and private message with other members of our community.
Sign Up Now!Funny, not seeing any excess deaths at world marathons and ultras.
If vaccine left them with a dodgy ticker surely they'd be first to fall, no?
You have way too much time on your hands. Maybe put a hot dog in them once in a while."New Peer-Reviewed Study Calls for Immediate Global Moratorium on COVID-19 'Vaccines'. The study reveals alarming breach in safety signal threshold for cerebral thrombosis amid mounting calls for market withdrawal."
https://ijirms.in/index.php/ijirms/article/view/1982
https://petermcculloughmd.substack.com/p/breaking-new-peer-reviewed-study
Funny, not seeing any excess deaths at world marathons and ultras.
If vaccine left them with a dodgy ticker surely they'd be first to fall, no?
Yeah not sure if that answers my question, champ.You are not a person who is driven by data and evidence. Instead, you're a mocker.
The excess deaths seen in the data of western governments - US, UK, EU, CA, AU for example - are typically around 14-18%. That does not mean that 14% of people are dropping dead. If it were, you'd see that happening. Instead, it is 14-18% over the historical norms of the number of people dying each year. YOU WILL NOT SEE THAT IN YOUR COMMUNITY. The only way to see it is in the data trends.
UK Excess Deaths are Up a Staggering 22% among 1 to 14-Year-Olds After “Magic Juice” Introduced (VIDEO)
![]()
Ed Dowd: UK Excess Deaths are Up a Staggering 22% among 1 to 14-Year-Olds After "Magic Juice" Introduced (VIDEO) | The Gateway Pundit | by Jim Hoft
Edward Dowd joined Jimmy Dore recently to discuss the staggering number of excess deaths for children in the UK.www.thegatewaypundit.com
Since you think that is pfff, I assume you don't have a child aged 1 to 14 years old.
Yeah not sure if that answers my question, champ.
That's a typically wrong assumption. Whilst this age group is well represented there's a massive number of runners over 50. Globally.And I'll answer your comment regarding marathoners and ultras. The government data says, for that age group that these people are typically -- let's say 18 to 35, there would be about an increase in death rates (or whatever the data said for those age groups).
That's a typically wrong assumption. Whilst this age group is well represented there's a massive number of runners over 50. Globally.
For example, in the Sydney marathon (Sept) there was approximately 2,500 runners over the age of 60. No deaths. Similar numbers at other world majors.
City to Surf (Aug), 80,000 participants or thereabouts. Recorded deaths for this race 2013, 2008, 2000. Full of jabbed oldies but no deaths for over ten years.
The ultra scene is full of us old fucks. Big numbers across the globe. After 100k and 4000m of ascent we should be dropping like flies. But that's not happening.
You see, I don't need to cherry pick anything to support a chosen narrative. In my case I've picked a grueling sport, where your heart and lungs are under the pump, that is chockers with old farts in an age bracket that is riddled with life style diseases. Yet they have clearly survived vaccines.
You see, I don't need to jump on any bandwagon. I just look at whats in front of me.
Just took a look through the thread you referenced.Obviously but please don't start him up again. This thread ran for 3 years over on the other forum with johnsmith constantly posting up easily debunkable garbage.
After 21 pages and 3 years of constantly banging on about it he finally admitted, 'there's not enough data'.
![]()
Inside Sport - Australia's premier sports magazine and website
The home of Australian sports news, intelligent journalism and stunning photography.forum.insidesport.com.au
Fuck me sideways.
Just took a look through the thread you referenced.
Same old same old with these people. All cut and paste, rehashing terms and phrases they've collected from other like-minded dopes on twitter et al. Not an original thought between them. Most of them with the written English skills of a seven year old. As you correctly say, all "easily debunkable garbage".
Gawd bless their idiocy.
I don't read newspapers or watch TV.![]()
Myocarditis Cases Reported After mRNA-Based COVID-19 Vaccination in the US From December 2020 to August 2021
This descriptive study compares the effect of mRNA-based COVID-19 vaccination with BNT162b2 (Pfizer-BioNTech) vs mRNA-1273 (Moderna) on the reported cases of myocarditis in the US after each vaccination dose.jamanetwork.com
Title: Myocarditis Cases Reported After mRNA-Based COVID-19 Vaccination in the US From December 2020 to August 2021"The rates of myocarditis cases were highest after the second vaccination dose in adolescent males aged 12 to 15 years ... , in adolescent males aged 16 to 17 years ... , and in young men aged 18 to 24 years ... , respectively)."
vo2Max, all your ridiculing is you just reading the newspaper, and mocking anyone who goes against what the TV tells you.
Whereas everything I write about vaccines, I have kept records of reports from medical people, and from medical research.
How may sportspeople have dropped like flies so far JS?
Goodsciencing, lol.
A self reported bunch of anonymous "investigators" and "truthseekers".
Now looking to depart their site and looking for people to take over running the joint.
Opportunity here for yer, mate![]()
Look at the homepage of good sciencing lol
They're also still going on about Ivermectin JFC![]()
Look at the homepage of good sciencing lol
They're also still going on about Ivermectin JFC![]()
What about tsf's critique on these 105 studies on Ivermectin? (updated November 2024)
![]()
Ivermectin reduces COVID-19 risk: real-time meta analysis of 105 studies
105 ivermectin COVID-19 controlled studies. 85% improvement for prophylaxis, p < 0.0001. 61% improvement for early treatment, p < 0.0001. 40% improvement for late treatment, p < 0.0001. ivmmetac19ivm.org