Amazing all these sooks are up in arms about... Trump hiring people based on the fact that ... they denied the [2020] election -
I did a search for cognitive dissonance - where "People invested in a given perspective shall—
when confronted with contrary evidence—expend great effort to justify retaining the challenged perspective." (wikipedia)
It goes without saying that 100% of people are prone to cognitive dissonance. I will be the first to admit it.
The biggest fork in the road is people's thinking of the 2020 Election steal.
- If the 2020 Election was NOT stolen by fraud, Trump is accused of being Hitler, a fascist, "threat to democracy" etc.
- If the 2020 Election was stolen by fraud, Trump is the greatest President since George Washington for standing up to the forces seeking to destroy America.
The above are the two opposite forks in the road.
It comes down to facts and evidence.
There's about 2% of you who will invest some time to learn the definition of when a Judge throws out a case based on "lack of standing":
I'll make it simple. Enter this into A.I. and see if it is true.
""Lack of standing" does not imply that the evidence presented is weak or inadequate. Instead, it refers to a situation where an individual lacks the legal right, or locus standi, to bring a case before the court. "Lack of standing" means that the court may refuse to consider the evidence in the first place. For example, if you witness a neighbor's house being burgled and you know who the thief is, even capturing video evidence of the break-in and the thief carrying away stolen goods, you possess strong evidence. However, if you file a lawsuit against the thief, the court may dismiss your case due to "lack of standing," because you are not the person who suffered harm from the burglary. In this scenario, the homeowner—the individual whose property was invaded—has the legal standing to pursue action against the thief. Therefore, "lack of standing" signifies that a party does not have the right to sue, rather than indicating that their evidence is poor or lacking in quality. Ask A.I. if this paragraph is accurate."
This means the vast majority of people were fooled by the Media. Virtually everyone thinks that because the U.S. courts threw out the 2020 Election court cases on technicalities like "lack of standing", the little people believe the Media that it meant there was virtually no evidence of 2020 election fraud.
I tried to explain this concept of "lack of standing" to friends who are top in their professions -- not lawyers -- and they refused to believe me. This is how STRONG the indoctrination runs in society.
Hence, if people who are super top in their prestigious professions, refuse to listen to the above explanation, how can you expect blokes and ladies on a football websites to exercise logic and fairness in dealing with facts and evidence??
The average person is not fair-minded. The reason is, the average person will side with the Media even when facts and evidence are shown that the Media lied. This is why propaganda is so effective.
THUS, the greatest test of Trump's 2nd presidential term will be the testing of evidence of the 2020 Election Fraud.
Let my people go - documentary by David Clements, a former prosecutor, and former law professor from New Mexico State University.
State of Denial, movie on election fraud
Trailer for the movie "2000 mules" - which reveals the use of fake ballots, ballot harvesting, deposited into Drop boxes by ballot "mules".
Why is all this important. I gain nothing by convincing you that the 2020 U.S. Election was stolen. Even if I were to feel an emotional boost by convincing a fraction of you, in reality I gain nothing.
The lesson to be learned is that the majority person is so hardened in their thinking, that they bring this hardened-heart in their rejection of the facts and evidence for the gospel message of Jesus Christ, that impacts their eternal destiny. (This includes people in false-versions of Christianity).