Welcome!

By registering with us, you'll be able to discuss, share and private message with other members of our community.

Sign Up Now!

Chronicles of a stable genius - all the biggliest stuff

this question is not only loaded but demonstrates your complete lack of understanding of the situation

Lol. Way to sidestep an uncomfortable question.

I would have said I can understand why Russia invaded but I 100% don't think sovereign countries should be invaded by other countries. But you do you if you're too gutless to put the proverbial on the block.
 
Lol. Way to sidestep an uncomfortable question.

I would have said I can understand why Russia invaded but I 100% don't think sovereign countries should be invaded by other countries. But you do you if you're too gutless to put the proverbial on the block.

I'm neither for nor against whatever strategy the Russian Federation chooses to take.

However Ukraine was taken from Ukrainians by western interests in the US backed coup of 2014 so this "sovereign country" line is simply nonsense I see parroted online by propagandised minds.
 
Your take on this war has several gaps and is very Von Der Leyen centric.

The US backed Ukraine regime didn't respect the boundaries of the Minsk II accords which is why Russia intervened. Angela Merkel also admitted years later that Minsk II was a stalling tactic whilst Ukraine's military was built up. Furthermore a new peace agreement was on the table before Boris Johnson intervened and instructed Zelensky to fight to the last Ukrainian.

The SMO is existential for Russia as NATO has crossed its last red line in its march eastward.
Serb 👍
 
1730757448065.png
 

Attachments

  • 1730757413764.png
    1730757413764.png
    54.1 KB · Views: 1
Not sure exactly what inference you're trying to draw here.

But, this is perfectly normal.

The US president isn't popularly elected. People vote for electors who select the president.

The per capita distribution of electoral votes is uneven. California (a democrat state) has 700k people per electoral college vote. Same with New York. Montana (republican) on the other hand.... 300k people per vote.

It doesn't come out super lop sided but yes, winning the popular vote isn't a guarantee of winning a us election. Democrats have won the popular vote in all but one election this millenium.
 
Last edited:
Not sure exactly what inference you're trying to draw here.

But, this is perfectly normal.

The US president isn't popularly elected. People vote for electors who select the president.

The per capita distribution of electoral votes is uneven. California (a democrat state) has 700k people per electoral college vote. Same with New York. Montana (republican) on the other hand.... 300k people per vote.

It doesn't come out super lop sided but yes, winning the popular vote isn't a guarantee of winning a us election.

No inference at all. I understand how the electoral college works. (And it makes sense. Could be tweaked but somewhat but it does what it says on the tin.)

Was just popping up some stats.
 
Trump is already saying the election is rigged - how dumb must you be to enter a second competition when you thought the first was rigged as well. Nobody would do that. But he dies it 'cause he knows he's full of shit.

But his supporters (and the demeted) buy this bullshit
 
I wonder what the apologists say for putin invading or taking control through proxy of 10 other countries around him...suppose that's NATO's fault too
 
Trump is already saying the election is rigged - how dumb must you be to enter a second competition when you thought the first was rigged as well. Nobody would do that. But he dies it 'cause he knows he's full of shit.

But his supporters (and the demeted) buy this bullshit
If you drew a Venn diagram with his supporters in one circle and the demented in the other, there would be a significant overlap.
 
I wonder what the apologists say for putin invading or taking control through proxy of 10 other countries around him...suppose that's NATO's fault too
you're not even at the worth time engaging with level
 
Can anyone imagine an election where Albo or Dutton (in fact any election in any country, anywhere) were flogging NFTs, bibles, Trumpcoin or watches?

And yet somehow the election is still a coin flip.
 
Back
Top