Welcome!

By registering with us, you'll be able to discuss, share and private message with other members of our community.

Sign Up Now!

Chronicles of a stable genius - all the biggliest stuff

T_S_F said:
Trump is already saying the election is rigged - how dumb must you be to enter a second competition when you thought the first was rigged as well. Nobody would do that. But he dies it 'cause he knows he's full of shit.

But his supporters (and the demeted) buy this bullshit
Click to expand...

This is a response generated by A.I.:

To understand the hypothetical claims of election fraud from supporters of Donald Trump, it's essential to explore various mechanisms they allege could facilitate such fraud. Below are key issues often cited in this context:

Mass Invalid Entries on Voter Rolls
One of the primary concerns raised involves **mass invalid entries** on voter rolls. This includes allegations that deceased individuals or those who have moved out of state remain registered to vote. Supporters argue that these inaccuracies could allow ineligible individuals to cast ballots, potentially skewing election outcomes. For instance, claims have been made that states have not adequately purged these names from their rolls, leading to inflated voter registration figures.

Voter Rolls Including Fake Entries
Another point of contention is the presence of **fake entries** on voter rolls. Some proponents assert that there are registrations for individuals who do not exist or were never eligible to vote, which could be exploited during elections. This issue is often linked to allegations regarding insufficient oversight and maintenance of voter registration lists by election officials.

Masses of Fake Ballots with Same Handwriting
Supporters also allege that there were **masses of fake ballots** submitted, all featuring the same handwriting. This claim suggests a coordinated effort to produce fraudulent ballots, raising questions about the authenticity of votes counted during the election. Such allegations typically arise from observations made during the ballot counting process, where observers noted similarities in handwriting across numerous ballots.

Masses of Fake Ballots from the Same Residential Address
There are claims that a significant number of **fake ballots originated from a single residential address**. This scenario implies that a group could potentially submit multiple fraudulent ballots using one address as a cover, thereby undermining the integrity of the voting process. Critics argue that this practice would be difficult to detect without rigorous checks on ballot submissions.

Ballot Harvesting
**Ballot harvesting**, or collecting and submitting ballots on behalf of others, is another area where fraud is alleged. Critics claim that this practice can lead to coercion or manipulation, where individuals may feel pressured to vote a certain way or may not fully understand how their votes are being cast. Supporters argue that without strict regulations, ballot harvesting can open doors to widespread fraud.

Drop Boxes
The use of **drop boxes** for ballot submission has also been scrutinized. Allegations suggest that these boxes could be targets for tampering or for submitting fraudulent ballots without proper oversight. Concerns center around the security and monitoring of these drop boxes, particularly in areas with high volumes of mail-in voting.

Unconstitutional Laws Against Signature Verification
Supporters argue that certain laws limiting **signature verification** processes are unconstitutional and contribute to potential fraud. They claim that without stringent verification methods, it becomes easier for ineligible voters to cast ballots undetected, thereby compromising election integrity.

Blocking Republican Poll Watchers
There are allegations that **Republican poll watchers** were obstructed from observing the voting process adequately. This claim suggests that transparency was lacking during critical moments of vote counting and verification, potentially allowing fraudulent activities to occur without oversight.

Unconstitutional Laws Allowing Mail-in Ballots After Election Due Dates
Finally, claims have been made regarding **laws permitting mail-in ballots to be counted after election due dates**, which some view as unconstitutional. Critics argue this could lead to manipulation where late ballots could be manufactured or altered after the election has concluded, thus affecting final results.

These points reflect the concerns raised by Trump supporters regarding potential election fraud mechanisms. Each issue underscores a broader narrative about maintaining election integrity and ensuring that only eligible voters participate in the electoral process.

Non-U.S.-Citizens Given Ability to Vote

Supporters of Donald Trump often raise concerns about the potential for illegal immigrants to vote in U.S. elections, particularly in the context of lax identification requirements. They argue that without stringent identification laws, there is a risk that undocumented individuals could register and cast ballots, undermining the integrity of the electoral process.

Mechanisms for Illegal Voting by Non-Citizens

1. **No ID Requirements**: Critics claim that some states allow voters to register without providing proof of citizenship. This could theoretically enable undocumented immigrants to register and vote by simply asserting their citizenship on registration forms, which do not always require documentary evidence.

2. **Voter Registration Processes**: The National Voter Registration Act mandates a standardized registration form that includes a declaration of U.S. citizenship under penalty of perjury. However, if enforcement is lax and verification processes are weak, individuals could potentially register without being citizens.

3. **Local Laws Allowing Non-Citizen Voting**: In certain municipalities, such as San Francisco, non-citizens are permitted to vote in local elections like school board contests. Supporters of Trump argue that these local laws could create a precedent or environment where illegal voting might occur more broadly.

4. **Absence of Rigorous Checks**: The lack of comprehensive checks at polling places could mean that individuals who are not U.S. citizens might slip through the cracks. While federal law prohibits non-citizens from voting in federal elections, enforcement relies heavily on the vigilance of poll workers and the accuracy of voter rolls.

5. **Allegations of Organized Efforts**: Some Trump supporters assert that there are organized efforts to encourage illegal immigrants to vote, suggesting that advocacy groups or political entities might facilitate this through outreach or misinformation campaigns about voting eligibility.

6. **Impact of Mail-in Voting**: The expansion of mail-in voting has raised concerns among some Republicans about its potential for abuse, including claims that it could make it easier for non-citizens to participate in elections without proper verification.

7. **Signature Verification Laws**: Claims have been made that certain laws limiting signature verification processes could make it easier for fraudulent ballots to be cast, potentially allowing non-citizens to vote undetected.

8. **Political Rhetoric and Mobilization**: The narrative surrounding illegal immigrant voting is often amplified by political rhetoric, which may mobilize supporters around the belief that their votes are being diluted by non-citizen participation.

While federal law explicitly prohibits non-citizens from voting and imposes penalties for violations, the concerns raised by Trump's supporters reflect broader anxieties about election integrity and the effectiveness of current safeguards against voter fraud.
 
johnsmith said:
This is a response generated by A.I.:

To understand the hypothetical claims of election fraud from supporters of Donald Trump, it's essential to explore various mechanisms they allege could facilitate such fraud. Below are key issues often cited in this context:

Mass Invalid Entries on Voter Rolls
One of the primary concerns raised involves **mass invalid entries** on voter rolls. This includes allegations that deceased individuals or those who have moved out of state remain registered to vote. Supporters argue that these inaccuracies could allow ineligible individuals to cast ballots, potentially skewing election outcomes. For instance, claims have been made that states have not adequately purged these names from their rolls, leading to inflated voter registration figures.

Voter Rolls Including Fake Entries
Another point of contention is the presence of **fake entries** on voter rolls. Some proponents assert that there are registrations for individuals who do not exist or were never eligible to vote, which could be exploited during elections. This issue is often linked to allegations regarding insufficient oversight and maintenance of voter registration lists by election officials.

Masses of Fake Ballots with Same Handwriting
Supporters also allege that there were **masses of fake ballots** submitted, all featuring the same handwriting. This claim suggests a coordinated effort to produce fraudulent ballots, raising questions about the authenticity of votes counted during the election. Such allegations typically arise from observations made during the ballot counting process, where observers noted similarities in handwriting across numerous ballots.

Masses of Fake Ballots from the Same Residential Address
There are claims that a significant number of **fake ballots originated from a single residential address**. This scenario implies that a group could potentially submit multiple fraudulent ballots using one address as a cover, thereby undermining the integrity of the voting process. Critics argue that this practice would be difficult to detect without rigorous checks on ballot submissions.

Ballot Harvesting
**Ballot harvesting**, or collecting and submitting ballots on behalf of others, is another area where fraud is alleged. Critics claim that this practice can lead to coercion or manipulation, where individuals may feel pressured to vote a certain way or may not fully understand how their votes are being cast. Supporters argue that without strict regulations, ballot harvesting can open doors to widespread fraud.

Drop Boxes
The use of **drop boxes** for ballot submission has also been scrutinized. Allegations suggest that these boxes could be targets for tampering or for submitting fraudulent ballots without proper oversight. Concerns center around the security and monitoring of these drop boxes, particularly in areas with high volumes of mail-in voting.

Unconstitutional Laws Against Signature Verification
Supporters argue that certain laws limiting **signature verification** processes are unconstitutional and contribute to potential fraud. They claim that without stringent verification methods, it becomes easier for ineligible voters to cast ballots undetected, thereby compromising election integrity.

Blocking Republican Poll Watchers
There are allegations that **Republican poll watchers** were obstructed from observing the voting process adequately. This claim suggests that transparency was lacking during critical moments of vote counting and verification, potentially allowing fraudulent activities to occur without oversight.

Unconstitutional Laws Allowing Mail-in Ballots After Election Due Dates
Finally, claims have been made regarding **laws permitting mail-in ballots to be counted after election due dates**, which some view as unconstitutional. Critics argue this could lead to manipulation where late ballots could be manufactured or altered after the election has concluded, thus affecting final results.

These points reflect the concerns raised by Trump supporters regarding potential election fraud mechanisms. Each issue underscores a broader narrative about maintaining election integrity and ensuring that only eligible voters participate in the electoral process.

Non-U.S.-Citizens Given Ability to Vote

Supporters of Donald Trump often raise concerns about the potential for illegal immigrants to vote in U.S. elections, particularly in the context of lax identification requirements. They argue that without stringent identification laws, there is a risk that undocumented individuals could register and cast ballots, undermining the integrity of the electoral process.

Mechanisms for Illegal Voting by Non-Citizens

1. **No ID Requirements**: Critics claim that some states allow voters to register without providing proof of citizenship. This could theoretically enable undocumented immigrants to register and vote by simply asserting their citizenship on registration forms, which do not always require documentary evidence.

2. **Voter Registration Processes**: The National Voter Registration Act mandates a standardized registration form that includes a declaration of U.S. citizenship under penalty of perjury. However, if enforcement is lax and verification processes are weak, individuals could potentially register without being citizens.

3. **Local Laws Allowing Non-Citizen Voting**: In certain municipalities, such as San Francisco, non-citizens are permitted to vote in local elections like school board contests. Supporters of Trump argue that these local laws could create a precedent or environment where illegal voting might occur more broadly.

4. **Absence of Rigorous Checks**: The lack of comprehensive checks at polling places could mean that individuals who are not U.S. citizens might slip through the cracks. While federal law prohibits non-citizens from voting in federal elections, enforcement relies heavily on the vigilance of poll workers and the accuracy of voter rolls.

5. **Allegations of Organized Efforts**: Some Trump supporters assert that there are organized efforts to encourage illegal immigrants to vote, suggesting that advocacy groups or political entities might facilitate this through outreach or misinformation campaigns about voting eligibility.

6. **Impact of Mail-in Voting**: The expansion of mail-in voting has raised concerns among some Republicans about its potential for abuse, including claims that it could make it easier for non-citizens to participate in elections without proper verification.

7. **Signature Verification Laws**: Claims have been made that certain laws limiting signature verification processes could make it easier for fraudulent ballots to be cast, potentially allowing non-citizens to vote undetected.

8. **Political Rhetoric and Mobilization**: The narrative surrounding illegal immigrant voting is often amplified by political rhetoric, which may mobilize supporters around the belief that their votes are being diluted by non-citizen participation.

While federal law explicitly prohibits non-citizens from voting and imposes penalties for violations, the concerns raised by Trump's supporters reflect broader anxieties about election integrity and the effectiveness of current safeguards against voter fraud.
Click to expand...
This whole response just makes allusions to "claims", "assertions" and "suggestions"

I could put something into AI on the complete opposite end of the spectrum and get something just as worthwhile.
 
T_S_F said:
Trump is already saying the election is rigged - how dumb must you be to enter a second competition when you thought the first was rigged as well. Nobody would do that. But he dies it 'cause he knows he's full of shit.

But his supporters (and the demeted) buy this bullshit
Click to expand...

Any nominee has a right to contest the results of an election... This has happened several times in recent history including democrats contesting results earlier this century. However when Trump did this he was labeled a dictator and a fascist. Its asinine.

Remember Hillary Clinton claimed Trump only won in 2016 because of "the Russians" and 2 impeachment hearings followed.

The apparent strategy of Trump is to motivate his base to vote (remembering non compulsory voting) even if the markets indicate a landslide in his favour to make sure the result is 'too big to rig' as its much easier to fix a close race than a one sided one. Its also easier to challenge in the courts a perceived close race than a one sided one. So the media are ensuring the perception of a close race narrative is promoted.
 
NicCarBel said:
This whole response just makes allusions to "claims", "assertions" and "suggestions"

I could put something into AI on the complete opposite end of the spectrum and get something just as worthwhile.
Click to expand...

You're talking to a bloke that believes the earth is 6000 years old and platypus's walked to Australia so I wouldn't put too much stock in what he's rabbiting on about.

Not to mention of the 60 cases they brought to court that claimed election fraud all sixty, THAT'S ALL SIXTY, were thrown out because, in layman's terms, they were bullshit.

But, but 'hijacked administration' or something. Was it 'hijacked' loopy or 'corrupted'? I can't be arsed trawling back through the thread.
 
Last edited:
Lock him up, lock him up, lock him up..

slate.com

The Big Reason Trump Is on the Verge of the Presidency, Instead of in Prison Where He Belongs

Donald Trump has spent his whole career evading the law. But the law helped him escape.
slate.com slate.com

This article is a proper look into how "unacceptable" decisions and behaviours by people in power, particularly in law enforcement.....


It doesn't try to let Trump voters off the hook, as they've had ample opportunity to see what's wrong with him. (The problem with that is that they largely ignore the news reporting accurately on it.) But as an alternative to holding out for an insincere apology from half the US of A, upon which the sensible persons ghost them forever and maybe punch them in the face first, it could be more productive to focus on all the cowards who let him get away with shit over many years, which not only kept him out of prison but boosted his popularity by creating an aura of invincibility. The more he got away with shit, the more he could treat his opponents as corrupt themselves. To a constituency that was never going to trust the other side regardless, this was a very persuasive tactic.
 
I'm glad the only interesting thing that happens in Australian elections is kids selling sausage in a roll for their school. America is a nuthouse.
 
  • Like
Reactions: LFC
erogenouszone said:
I'm glad the only interesting thing that happens in Australian elections is kids selling sausage in a roll for their school. America is a nuthouse.
Click to expand...
I've got a Canadian mate whom I met in the workplace. Used to give him a lot of shit about being from near the USA. He had the best way of describing yanks from perspective of a Canadian: "it's like living in the apartment above a meth lab"
 
All jokes aside Americans have been stirred and stirred and stirred into this thick vile gloop of fear and anxiety that this unholy alliance between Evangelical Nationalism and the Republican party is going to do something bad... Whether that is all out civil war, another march on the Capitol building or heaven forbid some rogue nukes launched abroad... if the Orange buffoon doesn't win fair and square there will be trouble... for the US abut more importantly;y for the rest of the world.

Not since the Grand Wizard of the clan marched his "knights" down to the steps of the capitol building in the a hundred years ago have the white "positive Christians" been so close to getting a puppet into the white house (and shit George W was a self confessed happy clapper himself)

Best thing that can happen is that this snively orange obscenity wins by a narrow margin, does his 4 years of uselessness and then the whole world can go back to some sort of semblance of balance...

This has been coming for 60-70 years... look up and read about the influence of Hans Kerrl and National evangelism .... it is the last hurrah of the white man
 
return_to_sender said:
Sorry, but the journo has these recordings for 7 years and can only think of releasing them the sunday before an election? That's not journalism, it's electioneering.
Click to expand...

Not sure why he left them for so long before releasing them. It makes no difference to his voters though. Like he said he could shoot someone on 5th Avenue and they'd still vote for him.
 
Muz said:
Remember morons banging on about mRNA vaccines?

Make sure you refuse treatment if this was you.

www.theguardian.com

World-first lung cancer vaccine trials launched across seven countries

First patient in UK gets dose of jab designed to kill most common form of lung cancer – and stop it coming back
www.theguardian.com www.theguardian.com
Click to expand...

Muz is the type of person that if a World Economic Forum brain implant promises health benefits, he'd be the first in line.

https://rumble.com/vxcuyh-human-implants-klaus-schwab.html
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top