Welcome!

By registering with us, you'll be able to discuss, share and private message with other members of our community.

Sign Up Now!

Chronicles of a stable genius - all the biggliest stuff

Smart response by trump with his garbage truck sketch, even if he looked ludicrous and couldn't;t open the door. He's probably just kicked that out the news cycle though

Looking forward to a juicy Election day whichever way it falls.
 
imagine thinking this late night 'comedian' isn't politically partisan

Who's saying he isn't?

But that aside. That is Trump actually saying he wants to be a whale psychiatrist. More hyperbole I suppose.

That is actually Trump's proxies carrying on like fucking morons.
 
Who's saying he isn't?

But that aside. That is Trump actually saying he wants to be a whale psychiatrist. More hyperbole I suppose.

That is actually Trump's proxies carrying on like fucking morons.
Maybe its just Trump wanting to assist his key demographic with services they could actually use?
 
Who's saying he isn't?

But that aside. That is Trump actually saying he wants to be a whale psychiatrist. More hyperbole I suppose.

That is actually Trump's proxies carrying on like fucking morons.

Trump is apparently the man that tells it like it is, except when he does and they then just say he didn't mean that.
 
If things weren't bonkers enough Trump is promising to let RFK 'go wild on health and medicines'.

This RFK.

1730427826461.png
 
Who's saying he isn't?

But that aside. That is Trump actually saying he wants to be a whale psychiatrist. More hyperbole I suppose.

That is actually Trump's proxies carrying on like fucking morons.

its odd how you let the media wind you up so much over minutia

TDS is a real condition it seems
 
its odd how you let the media wind you up so much over minutia

TDS is a real condition it seems

Given up trying to say they never said that or it's all hyperbole have we?
 
From yesterday's Libération with press reader translation



UNITED STATES Torrent of alarms about democracy

By FRÉDÉRIC AUTRAN special envoy to the United States and SALOMÉ KOURDOULI correspondence in Washington · Oct 31, 2024

Five days before the election, Kamala Harris and Donald Trump are neck and neck in the polls. "Liberation" probes the perils of a second term for the populist candidate for the White House.
A return to power of Donald Trump at the end of the presidential election on Tuesday threatens the stability of American institutions and respect for the rule of law.

These fears are also great in case of defeat, as the billionaire is unpredictable and aggressive.
She returned to the crime scene to urge Americans not to entrust the reins of their destiny (again) to the "little tyrant" Donald Trump. Tuesday evening, during a solemn speech depicted as a "final indictment" against her rival, Kamala Harris and tens of thousands of her supporters reappropriated the Ellipse, a vast expanse of lawn between the White House and the Washington Monument, famous obelisk of the capital of the United States.

On January 6, 2021, Donald Trump had also spoken there, in front of a crowd of supporters filled with rage against an election supposedly stolen from their guru by Democrat Joe Biden, a few weeks earlier.
"We will never give in," the Republican president said that morning. I know that everyone here will soon be marching to the Capitol to make their voice heard."With these few words, Donald Trump has just lit a spark that pushes his supporters to join Congress, two kilometers away. Channeled by well-prepared militias, anger has found its spillway. The American legislative temple is stormed. Police cordons smashed, windows smashed, offices ransacked, elected officials barricaded. Four Trump supporters die that day, including a woman shot by the police. A seriously affected Capitol police officer dies the next day. Nearly 150 members of the security forces are injured. America is cashing in on the shock, the world is watching with dread.
This January 6, 2021, Donald Trump made the American democracy wobble

caine, this "experience" so unique but also so fragile that had fascinated Tocqueville so much. He "sent an armed mob to the Capitol of the United States to overthrow the will of the people at the end of a free and fair election that he knew he had lost," Kamala Harris found it useful to recall Tuesday evening. Trump, on the other hand, still has an emotional memory of it. "It was a day of love," he recently proclaimed.
fanatical faithful

Almost four years later, five days before the presidential election, arguably the most tense and indecisive in the history of the United States, Washington is shaking. The capital is not ready for a second Trump term, otherwise threatening than the first. The Supreme Court is acquired for him. And in the entourage of Trump, who promised to be "a dictator on the first day of his term", only the relatives and the fanatical faithful remain. The guards have disappeared, such as General John Kelly, his former chief of staff, who last week called him a "fascist" in an interview with the New York Times.

Since the beginning of his campaign, Donald Trump has hinted at a government at his mercy and at his service, dedicated to respecting his desires without regard for the rule of law. His official program promises a "purge of corruption in "the swamp"", the nickname given to Washington by the billionaire. To "stop a woke and politicized government", the "corrupt employees" would be fired. "We are going to see a much more radical approach and
aggressive on the part of Donald Trump, analyzes Max Stier, president of Partnership for Public Service, a non-partisan organization that works with the government to ensure its proper functioning. He wants to redirect the entire government to his personal agenda, use his authority to prosecute private entities, political enemies, rather than enforce the law.»

This connoisseur of the arcana of Washington fears the massive arrival in the federal authorities of "people who will above all be loyal to Donald Trump, as opposed to the oath they will have to take to the rule of law". Beyond the measures listed in the candidate's program, the "Project 2025" gives a much more precise overview of his priorities if he gains power again. If Trump has sought to distance himself from this 900-page roadmap, it was nevertheless written by a dozen of his former aides. Called the "presidential transition project", this program aims to profoundly transform federal governance structures, drawing a line under some of the pillars of American democracy. "The entire government is under threat,"


Max Stier is still alarmed.
ALARM BELL
Among the departments most at risk, Justice. To attack his own enemies, Donald Trump could well make the American judicial apparatus a weapon at his service, trampling on laws as well as uses. The US Department of Justice, nicknamed "DoJ" in English (Department of Justice), is headed by an attorney general appointed by the President. But the department "has a long tradition of independence that was strengthened following Watergate," emphasizes William Yeomans, a prosecutor who held various positions at the Department of Justice for twenty-six years and now a law professor at Columbia University.


"Trump's first term showed how the Department of Justice could be put out of business, and this can happen again because almost all the DoJ's protections against political interference are customs or traditions, not enshrined in law," he explains. To deeply pervert its role and functioning, Donald Trump could name only his most loyal collaborators. "He has already indicated that he will hire people who are much more radical and loyal to him, and therefore less likely to oppose his authoritarian projects. He has already vowed to use Justice to attack his political opponents and all those who have not sworn loyalty to him," details William Yeomans.

The rest of the government also has every reason to tremble. The "Project 2025" thus proposes to abolish the Ministry of Education, portrayed as a leftist stronghold, to make such budget cuts that those of Work or Commerce could no longer survive. For the others, the stranglehold of Donald Trump and his ideas would prevent any independence or proper functioning. Despite the magnitude of the threat, it is difficult for federal employees to sound the alarm themselves, since a law formally prohibits them from taking a political position. But the institutions and organizations that work with the government do not hesitate to express their deep apprehension.

The Environmental Integrity Project (EIP) closely monitors the federal Environmental Protection Agency (EPA), making sure, for example, that no climate skeptic lobbyists get into high positions there or prosecute it in court in case of drift. During the first term of Donald Trump, who speaks of climate change as a "hoax" or a "scam", the face of the EPA has been transformed. "It was devastating," sums up Tom Pelton, spokesman for the EIP. "He had appointed several people with direct links to polluting industries, many scientists have left, there have been a lot of efforts to revisit regulations on air and water pollution," he lists.
The arrival of Joe Biden at the White House at the beginning of 2021 made it possible to cancel these decisions, but it took time. "Anyone who cares about the environment should beware of someone who calls climate change a lie. If he were president again, the ministry would find itself under siege again, there would be all kinds of efforts to deregulate and derail an agency essential to the protection of public health," warns Tom Pelton.


FRAGILE COGS
To prevent a new assault on their institutions, Americans can choose Kamala Harris during a democratic election ... which Donald Trump will certainly hasten to question. He who still maintains today that the 2020 election was "stolen" from him. If he loses the November 5 election, who knows what his reaction will be? "I don't think another January 6th will happen in the same way, but there are other ways to deny the results," says Emily Rodriguez, an election security specialist at Protect Democracy, a non-partisan association for the protection of American democracy.

After the 2020 election, Donald Trump's lawyers filed about sixty legal actions to challenge the results. This year, more than 100 procedures have been launched, even before the elections were held. "These lawsuits are not based on law, but on conspiracies," clarifies Emily Rodriguez, but "when you file a lawsuit, you give legitimacy to your lie. We expect there will be more prosecutions after the Nov. They will not be based on the law, but used to make noise.»

If he defeats Kamala Harris, a return of Donald Trump to power could simply herald the end of democracy in the United States, predict those who know the fragile workings. Bitter, Prosecutor William Yeomans sums it up like this: "Trump has openly threatened democracy. He called for an ”end" to the Constitution. He has already tried to block the peaceful transfer of power. He sought to reject the votes of millions of citizens. I don't need to say any more.»


Shared via <a href=http://www.pressreader.com>PressReader.com
 
Quick - put this senile cunt in charge of the world - wtf is this?

 
  • Like
Reactions: Muz
If trump was still president would you of had the wars in Ukraine and Middle East?
Concerning Ukraine, yes. The war started in 2014 and was raging throughout Trump's term in office. The "special military operation" in 2022 was intended to end that war by toppling Kyiv and basically flipping the switch off on Ukraine's defense. That it ended up being such an embarrassing shit show drawn out over almost 3 years doesn't rewrite 2022 as being the start of a new war.

This "Putin wouldn't have dared if I was in charge" is contrived nonsense and dangerous. It makes a very real possibility that trump would "do a deal" that respects the boundaries as they were when he says it started, which more or less means Putin gets to keep what he stole. Nobody outside shit hole dictatorships wants it except the tandoori with a scrotum under his chin.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: Muz
Wow - amazing the 'Trump tells it like it is' brigade, saying 'that's not what he meant!' when just calling for his political opponents to be shot. Some wild shit on here at the moment from him: https://www.drudgereport.com/
 
Trump referred to Liz Cheney as a 'radical war hawk' and suggested that she should experience being in a dangerous situation, saying, "Let's put her with a rifle standing there with nine barrels shooting at her" to see how she would feel about sending troops into battle.

Liz Cheney responded with: "This is how dictators destroy free nations. They threaten those who speak against them with death".

Trump's opponents seized on Cheney's response and framed Trump's remarks as inciting violence. The political discourse, exaggeration and provocative statements have been plentiful in this election. Trump himself has been called a 'threat to democracy', a fascist, and even a Nazi. MSNBC even went so far as to equate Trump's rallies to those of the Nazis in the 1930s.

Trump and Liz Cheney have a history.

Only Trump has been shot at during this election.

It depends on which echo chamber you reside in, I suppose.
 
Trump 'the father of fertilisation' apparently.

 
Concerning Ukraine, yes. The war started in 2014 and was raging throughout Trump's term in office. The "special military operation" in 2022 was intended to end that war by toppling Kyiv and basically flipping the switch off on Ukraine's defense. That it ended up being such an embarrassing shit show drawn out over almost 3 years doesn't rewrite 2022 as being the start of a new war.

This "Putin wouldn't have dared if I was in charge" is contrived nonsense and dangerous. It makes a very real possibility that trump would "do a deal" that respects the boundaries as they were when he says it started, which more or less means Putin gets to keep what he stole. Nobody outside shit hole dictatorships wants it except the tandoori with a scrotum under his chin.

Your take on this war has several gaps and is very Von Der Leyen centric.

The US backed Ukraine regime didn't respect the boundaries of the Minsk II accords which is why Russia intervened. Angela Merkel also admitted years later that Minsk II was a stalling tactic whilst Ukraine's military was built up. Furthermore a new peace agreement was on the table before Boris Johnson intervened and instructed Zelensky to fight to the last Ukrainian.

The SMO is existential for Russia as NATO has crossed its last red line in its march eastward.
 
Your take on this war has several gaps and is very Von Der Leyen centric.

The US backed Ukraine regime didn't respect the boundaries of the Minsk II accords which is why Russia intervened. Angela Merkel also admitted years later that Minsk II was a stalling tactic whilst Ukraine's military was built up. Furthermore a new peace agreement was on the table before Boris Johnson intervened and instructed Zelensky to fight to the last Ukrainian.

The SMO is existential for Russia as NATO has crossed its last red line in its march eastward.

Soooooo just to be clear you're OK with Russia invading Ukraine?
 
Back
Top